Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for estimating the sound pressure at the eardrum.

H Hudde1, A Engel, A Lodwig

  • 1Institut für Kommunikationsakustik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany. hudde@ika.ruhr-uni-bochum.de

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|October 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conditional progression-free survival in patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with first-line ribociclib and endocrine therapy: real-world data from the RIBANNA study.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

A region within the third extracellular loop of rat Aquaporin 6 precludes trafficking to plasma membrane in a heterologous cell line.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

MTT Heterogeneity in Perfusion CT Imaging as a Predictor of Outcome after Aneurysmal SAH.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
Same author

ADANO recommendations for the selection of target parameters and measurement processes for the use of auditory evoked potentials, otoacoustic emissions, and impedance audiometry in clinical trials : Prepared by the ERA consortium (AG-ERA)<sup>*</sup> of ADANO<sup>#</sup>. Confirmed by the board of ADANO on 18.01.2019.

HNO·2019
Same author

[ADANO recommendations for the selection of target parameters and measurement processes for use of auditory evoked potentials, otoacoustic emissions, and impedance audiometry in clinical trials : Prepared by the consortium ERA (AG-ERA) of ADANO. Confirmed by the board of ADANO on 18 January 2019. German version].

HNO·2019
Same author

Less is more: re-evaluating systematic reviews.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2018
Same journal

Interaction of near-wall bubble arrays with acoustic waves induced by an oscillating rigid wall.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Ultra-broadband underwater acoustic projector based on transverse resonance orthogonal beam (TROB) mode and acoustic matching layer technique.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Fine-scale quantitative analysis of bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) song shows varying stability of song types.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Accurately measuring sound pressure at the eardrum requires accounting for individual ear canal shapes. New methods like the reflectance phase method significantly reduce estimation errors in audiometry.

Area of Science:

  • Acoustics
  • Audiology
  • Bioacoustics

Background:

  • Accurate sound pressure estimation at the eardrum is crucial for audiometry.
  • Current methods often use ear simulators (e.g., IEC 711) approximating an average ear.
  • Individual ear canal variations can introduce significant errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate errors in estimating eardrum sound pressure.
  • To compare the impact of individual ear canals versus ear simulator deviations.
  • To evaluate methods for improving eardrum sound pressure estimation accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Calculated errors for a Beyer DT 48 earphone with IEC 711 and ideal couplers.
  • Determined the necessity of individual ear canal chain matrices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied and validated the reflectance phase method and pressure minima method.
  • Used a physical ear canal and middle ear model for validation.

    • Main Results:

    • Individual ear canal effects can cause errors up to 15 dB, exceeding ear simulator deviations.
    • The reflectance phase method provides best estimates.
    • The pressure minima method offers good results, with limitations in narrow frequency bands.
    • The reflectance phase method, validated on a physical model, limits estimation errors to under 3 dB above 10 kHz.

    Conclusions:

    • Individual ear canal characteristics are critical for accurate eardrum sound pressure estimation in audiometry.
    • The reflectance phase method is a reliable technique for minimizing estimation errors.
    • Accurate ear canal modeling is essential for precise hearing assessments.