Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A normal' category-specific advantage for naming living things.

K R Laws1, C Neve

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, UK. K.Laws@Herts.ac.uk

Neuropsychologia
|October 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Normal individuals struggle more with naming nonliving objects than living things under rapid presentation. Visual familiarity, not name frequency or complexity, predicts naming accuracy for objects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The inflexible mind: A critical factor in understanding and addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

Journal of psychiatric research·2024
Same author

ECT is evidence-based - a commentary on depression: why drugs and electricity are not the answer.

Psychological medicine·2022
Same author

A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2022
Same author

CBT for schizophrenia: a critical viewpoint.

Psychological medicine·2019
Same author

Gestational diabetes mellitus screening according to Carpenter-Coustan and IADPSG criteria: A 7-year follow-up of prevalence, treatment and neonatal complications at a Belgian general hospital.

Diabetes & metabolism·2017
Same author

Selective reporting of results in guidelines.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Previous theories suggested living things are harder to name due to visual complexity and similarity.
  • These 'artefactual' accounts proposed category-specific deficits are exaggerations of normal naming tendencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate normal naming performance for living versus nonliving things under speeded conditions.
  • To identify factors influencing naming accuracy, challenging existing hypotheses.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a speeded presentation paradigm to assess object naming in healthy subjects.
  • Measured name frequency, concept familiarity, visual complexity, and a novel visual familiarity metric.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Normal subjects were significantly worse at naming nonliving things compared to living things.
  • Naming accuracy was not predicted by concept familiarity, name frequency, or visual complexity.
  • Visual familiarity with an object's appearance strongly predicted naming performance.

Conclusions:

  • Contrary to prior hypotheses, nonliving things are harder to name under speeded conditions due to greater visual unpredictability.
  • The findings suggest that the inherent visual variability of nonliving items impacts cognitive processing.
  • Multiple real-world representations of nonliving objects may reduce the likelihood of recognition impairments in this category.