Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Retroactive interference in 3-month-old infants.

A Rossi-George1, C Rovee-Collier

  • 1Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.

Developmental Psychobiology
|October 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interactions of lifetime lead exposure and stress: behavioral, neurochemical and HPA axis effects.

Neurotoxicology·2010
Same author

Experimental manipulations blunt time-induced changes in brain monoamine levels and completely reverse stress, but not Pb+/-stress-related modifications to these trajectories.

Behavioural brain research·2009
Same author

Alterations in glucocorticoid negative feedback following maternal Pb, prenatal stress and the combination: a potential biological unifying mechanism for their corresponding disease profiles.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2008
Same author

Influence of low level maternal Pb exposure and prenatal stress on offspring stress challenge responsivity.

Neurotoxicology·2008
Same author

CNS effects of developmental Pb exposure are enhanced by combined maternal and offspring stress.

Neurotoxicology·2008
Same author

New and evolving concepts in the neurotoxicology of lead.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2007
Same journal

Maternal Early Pregnancy Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Metabolites Correlate With Newborn Resting-State Functional Connectivity.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Navigating Stress: Exploring the Role of Empathy in Caregiving.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Children With Idiopathic Toe Walking Display Different Cortical Activation Patterns When Interpreting Tactile Sensation.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Epigenetic Mechanisms Linking Maternal Stress During Pregnancy to Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Narrative Review.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Visuomotor Maturation From Middle Childhood to Adolescence.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
Same journal

Activational Effects of Gonadal Hormones on Social Reward Motivation in Adolescence and Adulthood in Female and Male Long-Evans Rats.

Developmental psychobiology·2026
See all related articles

Infant memory is affected by new information. Similar or closely timed new stimuli can interfere with infant learning and recall, especially for context.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Infant Memory

Background:

  • Retroactive interference is a phenomenon where learning new information can impair memory for older information.
  • Understanding infant memory development is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research has explored factors influencing memory in infants, but the specific roles of similarity and timing in retroactive interference require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the similarity and timing of interpolated information affect retroactive interference in human infants.
  • To determine if the nature (cue vs. context) and novelty of interpolated stimuli influence memory recall in 3-month-old infants.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted with 3-month-old infants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Infants learned to associate a mobile (cue) with a distinctive context.
  • Novel stimuli (cue, context, or both) were introduced at varying times and similarity levels, followed by recognition tests 24 hours later.

    • Main Results:

    • Retroactive interference occurred when interpolated stimuli were similar to training stimuli.
    • A novel context impaired recognition up to 2 hours after initial learning.
    • A novel cue impaired recognition up to 40 minutes after initial learning, suggesting faster processing of cues.

    Conclusions:

    • Retroactive interference in infants is influenced by both the similarity and timing of interpolated information.
    • Infant memory recall is sensitive to the novelty and temporal proximity of interfering stimuli.
    • Cues appear to be less vulnerable to retroactive interference than contextual information in early development.