Related Experiment Videos
Hospital monitoring of pressure ulcers in the UK
Insights
Pressure ulcer audits lack standardized methods across UK hospitals. This study reveals significant national variations in pressure ulcer assessment tools and data collection, highlighting the need for a unified auditing approach.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Nursing Research
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Increasing expectation for hospitals to report pressure ulcer (PU) incidence.
- Lack of standardized methodologies and understanding of current PU monitoring practices.
- Need for systematic pressure ulcer audits in healthcare settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a national overview of pressure ulcer assessment and audit practices in UK acute hospital trusts.
- To identify variations in pressure ulcer monitoring and data collation methods.
- To inform the development of standardized auditing protocols.
Main Methods:
- A postal survey was distributed to 276 acute hospital trusts in the UK.
- A response rate of 74% (204 trusts) was achieved.
- Data collected on staffing (e.g., tissue viability nurses), assessment tools, grading scales, risk assessment frequency, and monitoring returns.
Main Results:
- Only 40% of trusts employed a dedicated tissue viability nurse; 28.5% had other clinical nurse specialists.
- Most hospitals utilized single scales for PU grading and risk assessment, with considerable variation in survey frequency and methodology.
- Low frequency of daily PU monitoring (5%), with weekly (30%) and monthly (22%) returns being more common.
Conclusions:
- Significant national variations exist in pressure ulcer assessment tools, audit data provision, and data collation methodologies.
- Current practices for pressure ulcer auditing lack uniformity across UK hospitals.
- A national consensus on pressure ulcer auditing is recommended to improve consistency and data reliability.
Abstract:
Hospital trusts and health authorities are increasingly being expected to report on numbers of patients with pressure ulcers. Although pressure ulcer audits should be undertaken in a systematic way, there are no agreed standards and little is known about the current status of pressure ulcer monitoring. A postal survey was conducted to establish a national picture of both assessment and audit of pressure ulcers. Questionnaires were sent to 276 acute hospital trusts throughout the UK; 204 were returned, giving a response rate of 74%. Fewer than half of the trusts (40%) employed a tissue viability nurse, and 28.5% of respondents were another type of clinical nurse specialist. Most hospitals used single scales for grading pressure ulcers and risk assessment but the frequency and method of such surveys varied considerably. Relatively few hospitals (5%) monitored the number of pressure ulcers on a daily basis, 30% made some form of weekly return and 22% made monthly returns. The authors conclude that there are national variations with respect to the pressure ulcer assessment tools used to provide audit data, and to the methodology and documentation used to collate data. A national consensus is recommended on auditing of pressure ulcers in the UK.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...