Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Qualitative hemispheric differences in semantic category matching.

K I Taylor1, P Brugger, D Weniger

  • 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Brain and Language
|October 27, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How helpful are the European AIDS Clinical Society cognitive screening questions in predicting cognitive impairment in an aging, well-treated HIV-positive population?

HIV medicine·2019
Same author

The Neurocognitive Assessment in the Metabolic and Aging Cohort (NAMACO) study: baseline participant profile.

HIV medicine·2019
Same author

Positive effects of fampridine on cognition, fatigue and depression in patients with multiple sclerosis over 2 years.

Journal of neurology·2018
Same author

Adaptive behavior in autism: Minimal clinically important differences on the Vineland-II.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2017
Same author

Persistent effects of playing football and associated (subconcussive) head trauma on brain structure and function: a systematic review of the literature.

British journal of sports medicine·2016
Same author

Testing vs. Believing Hypotheses: Magical Ideation in the Judgement of Contingencies.

Cognitive neuropsychiatry·2014
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

The interplay between attentional control and language task schemas: Progressive adaptation of attentional control in interpreting.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

You again? 14-month-olds show neural signatures of lexical-semantic activation for novel instead of familiar voices.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Five-year-old children engage temporal but not frontal mechanisms during morphosyntactic processing of sentences.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

The left hemisphere (LH) processes semantics rapidly and focally, while the right hemisphere (RH) processes them slowly and diffusely, supporting a depth of activation model for hemispheric processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Hemispheric Specialization

Background:

  • Investigating the distinct roles of the right hemisphere (RH) and left hemisphere (LH) in semantic processing is crucial for understanding brain function.
  • Previous research suggests hemispheric asymmetries in language and cognitive tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore semantic processing differences between the RH and LH using a word-based category matching task.
  • To test the depth of activation hypothesis regarding hemispheric information processing.

Main Methods:

  • A unilateral category matching task with words as stimuli was used.
  • Behavioral data (reaction times) were analyzed using Individual Differences Multidimensional Scaling (INDSCAL).
  • Performance was assessed in both the right visual field (RVF)/LH and left visual field (LVF)/RH.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Overall LH dominance was observed for semantic processing, with performance better than chance in both visual fields.
  • INDSCAL analysis revealed significantly more differentiated semantic structures in the LVF/RH compared to the RVF/LH.
  • The RH showed a more differentiated semantic network structure than the LH.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the depth of activation hypothesis: LH processes semantics rapidly and focally.
  • The RH engages in slower, more diffuse semantic activation, indicating a broader but less focused processing style.
  • This suggests complementary roles for both hemispheres in semantic network organization and retrieval.