Related Experiment Videos
Is there a role for radical esophagectomy
T Lerut1, W Coosemans, P De Leyn
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.
Summary
Extensive lymph node dissection, including the cervical area (third field), improves staging accuracy and prolongs tumor control for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. This radical surgical approach offers better survival rates without increasing patient mortality or morbidity.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Esophageal Cancer Treatment
Background:
- The primary goal of surgery for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer is cure, necessitating complete tumor removal (R0 resection).
- The extent of lymph node dissection, particularly cervical lymph node dissection (third field), remains a controversial aspect of surgical treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the benefits of extended lymphadenectomy, including the third field, in esophageal and GEJ cancer surgery.
- To assess the impact of extensive lymph node dissection on staging, tumor control, and cure rates.
Main Methods:
- Review of available data and published reports on lymphadenectomy extent in esophageal and GEJ cancer surgery.
- Analysis of outcomes including staging accuracy, locoregional recurrence rates, metastasis, and survival benefits.
Main Results:
- Unforeseen cervical lymph node involvement is found in up to 30% of patients after three-field lymphadenectomy, even in GEJ tumors (up to 20% in T3N+).
- Radical esophagectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy has been associated with locoregional recurrence rates below 10% and delayed onset of recurrence and metastasis.
- Studies indicate a survival benefit with radical esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy, suggesting it offers the best chance for cure.
Conclusions:
- Radical surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy, including the cervical field, provides optimal staging, prolonged tumor control, and improved cure rates for esophageal and GEJ cancer.
- This approach can be performed without increasing hospital mortality or morbidity.
- Survival figures from radical surgery serve as a benchmark for evaluating other treatment modalities.