Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The results framework--an innovative tool for program planning and evaluation.

M M Toffolon-Weiss1, J T Bertrand, S S Terrell

  • 1Department of Sociology, Tulane University, USA.

Evaluation Review
|October 28, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use of traditional and modern methods of fertility control in Kinshasa, Zaire.

Population studies·2011
Same author

Field supervision for quality control of local family planning workers in developing countries.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

Sexual practices among the quiché-speaking mayan population of guatemala.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

Empirically based conversion factors for calculating couple-years of protection.

Evaluation review·2000
Same author

The male versus female perspective on family planning: kinshasa, zaire.

Journal of biosocial science·1996
Same author

AIDS knowledge in three sites in Bas-Zaire.

AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education·1992
Same journal

Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Peer-led Support Groups for Parents Following Child Removal: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Teacher-AI Collaboration to Support Assessment and Feedback: A Case Study in Norwegian Secondary Education.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Green Policies for the Circular Economy and Entrepreneurship: International Evidence.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Transparency, Ethical Framing, and User Agency as Determinants of Trust in AI-Mediated Assessment: Informing the Design of Trustworthy Systems.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

No Evidence that Banning the Purchase of Sex Increases Rape: A Replication Study of Ciacci (2024, 2025).

Evaluation review·2026
See all related articles

The results framework improves planning and evaluation for United States Agency for International Development (USAID) projects. This collaborative tool enhances HIV/AIDS prevention initiatives by using longitudinal data throughout the project lifecycle.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Program Evaluation
  • International Development

Background:

  • The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) increasingly mandates the use of a results framework for project planning and evaluation.
  • Traditional evaluation methods often rely on external consultants for discrete midterm and end-of-project assessments.
  • There is a need for more integrated and continuous approaches to program monitoring and evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a case study on the development and implementation of the results framework.
  • To highlight the advantages of the results framework compared to traditional evaluation methods.
  • To demonstrate the application of the results framework in a USAID-funded HIV/AIDS prevention initiative in Central America.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study methodology focusing on a specific USAID-funded regional HIV/AIDS prevention initiative.
  • Description of the development and implementation process of the results framework.
  • Analysis of the collaborative approach involving program staff, donors, partners, and evaluators.

Main Results:

  • The results framework offers a more integrated and longitudinal approach to program evaluation.
  • It facilitates teamwork among stakeholders for data collection and utilization.
  • The framework provides advantages over traditional, externally-driven evaluation models.

Conclusions:

  • The results framework is an innovative and effective tool for USAID project planning and evaluation.
  • Its implementation can lead to improved data utilization for adaptive management.
  • Collaborative engagement throughout the project lifecycle enhances evaluation rigor and impact.