Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structural goals in craniofacial surgery.

L A Whitaker, D LaRossa, P Randall

    The Cleft Palate Journal
    |January 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Scaling estimates of amplitude for movements without visual guidance.

    Journal of motor behavior·2013
    Same author

    Emerging impact of CTA/perfusion CT on acute stroke thrombolysis in a community hospital.

    Journal of neurointerventional surgery·2011
    Same author

    Body image dissatisfaction in women seeking rhytidectomy or blepharoplasty.

    Aesthetic surgery journal·2009
    Same author

    Accuracy of fetal echocardiography in the routine detection of congenital heart disease among unselected and low risk populations: a systematic review.

    BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2005
    Same author

    Clinical characteristics of patients with unicoronal synostosis and mutations of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3: a preliminary report.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
    Same author

    Cleft lip and palate.

    Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2001
    Same journal

    Agnathia and associated malformations: a case report.

    The Cleft palate journal·1990
    Same journal

    Webbing of the pharyngeal recess in adults with cleft palate.

    The Cleft palate journal·1990
    Same journal

    The tongue flap: placement and fixation for closure of postpalatoplasty fistulae.

    The Cleft palate journal·1990
    Same journal

    The aerodynamic characteristics of speech produced by normal speakers and cleft palate speakers with adequate velopharyngeal function.

    The Cleft palate journal·1990
    Same journal

    Dexamethasone receptor levels in palatal and lung fibroblasts of adult A/J and C57BL/6J mice: relationship to glucocorticoid-induced cleft palate.

    The Cleft palate journal·1990
    Same journal

    Individual skull model fabrication for craniofacial surgery.

    The Cleft palate journal·1990
    See all related articles

    Craniofacial abnormalities require precise surgical planning. Understanding normal facial relations guides corrective procedures for conditions like craniofacial stenosis and hypertelorism.

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic Surgery
    • Craniofacial Surgery
    • Medical Imaging

    Background:

    • Major craniofacial abnormalities necessitate systematic operative planning.
    • Defining normal anatomical relations is crucial for identifying deviations and setting surgical goals.
    • Syndromes like craniofacial stenosis, hypertelorism, and mandibulofacial dysostoses present significant facial structural changes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline a systematic approach to operative planning for major craniofacial abnormalities.
    • To emphasize the importance of defining normal standards for corrective surgical goals.
    • To detail key measurements and considerations for planning craniofacial reconstructive surgery.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing patient examination, X-rays, dental models, and photography to define abnormal structures.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Establishing standards of norm through studies, publications, and direct skull measurements.
  • Employing precise measurements of orbits, maxillary-mandibular relations, and cranial base dimensions.

    • Main Results:

    • Abnormal craniofacial relations and structures are clearly defined through comprehensive assessment.
    • Normal standards provide quantifiable goals for surgical correction.
    • Key measurements include interocular distance, orbital dimensions, cranial base length, and zygomatic arch size.

    Conclusions:

    • Precise measurement and understanding of normal craniofacial anatomy are essential for effective surgical planning.
    • A systematic approach considering bony and soft tissue alterations ensures optimal outcomes.
    • Detailed preoperative assessment guides complex craniofacial reconstructive procedures.