Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks.

H D Zimmer1, J Engelkamp

  • 1Saarland University, Department of Psychology, Saarbrücken, Germany. huzimmer@rz.uni-sb.de

Memory & Cognition
|November 30, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Episodic recall with special reference to German contributions].

Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie·2001
Same author

Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

[Selective interference, process dissociation and serial information in recall of performed actions. A comment on Thorsten Meiser's remarks on the multimodal memory theory].

Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie·2000
Same author

Spatial information with pictures and words in visual short-term memory.

Psychological research·1998
Same author

Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.

Memory (Hove, England)·1998
Same journal

The properties of personal semantics.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Performing actions during learning (subject-performed tasks) reduces the impact of memory encoding depth compared to verbal learning tasks. Conceptual processing still offers a slight memory advantage, but less than in traditional verbal tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • The levels-of-processing framework posits that deeper, conceptual encoding leads to better memory recall than shallow, surface-level encoding.
  • Subject-performed tasks (SPTs) involve encoding information by physically performing actions associated with it.
  • The extent to which levels-of-processing effects apply to SPTs compared to standard verbal learning tasks (VTs) is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the magnitude of levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks (SPTs) versus traditional verbal learning tasks (VTs).
  • To examine how surface versus conceptual orienting tasks influence recall in both SPT and VT conditions.
  • To understand the underlying mechanisms responsible for any observed differences in memory effects between SPTs and VTs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using action phrases as learning material.
  • Participants were assigned to either a subject-performed task (SPT) or a verbal learning task (VT) condition.
  • Within each condition, participants used either a surface or a conceptual orienting task during encoding.

Main Results:

  • Both SPT and VT conditions showed better recall with conceptual than surface orienting tasks, confirming a levels-of-processing effect.
  • However, the levels-of-processing effect was significantly reduced in the SPT condition compared to the VT condition.
  • Items encoded via surface tasks in SPTs were recalled substantially well, nearly as effectively as conceptually encoded items in VTs.

Conclusions:

  • The reduced levels-of-processing effect in SPTs arises because performing an action necessitates conceptual processing, even with a surface-level instruction.
  • A small conceptual advantage persists in SPTs because the action component leads to less integration into memory compared to focusing solely on semantic context.
  • This lower integration in SPTs, even with conceptual processing, reduces item accessibility, particularly under verbal surface encoding tasks.