Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks.

H D Zimmer1, J Engelkamp

  • 1Saarland University, Department of Psychology, Saarbrücken, Germany. huzimmer@rz.uni-sb.de

Memory & Cognition
|November 30, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Performing actions during learning (subject-performed tasks) reduces the impact of memory encoding depth compared to verbal learning tasks. Conceptual processing still offers a slight memory advantage, but less than in traditional verbal tasks.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Episodic recall with special reference to German contributions].

Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie·2001
Same author

Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2000
Same author

[Selective interference, process dissociation and serial information in recall of performed actions. A comment on Thorsten Meiser's remarks on the multimodal memory theory].

Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie·2000
Same author

Spatial information with pictures and words in visual short-term memory.

Psychological research·1998
Same author

Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.

Memory (Hove, England)·1998

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research
  • Learning Sciences

Background:

  • The levels-of-processing framework posits that deeper, conceptual encoding leads to better memory recall than shallow, surface-level encoding.
  • Subject-performed tasks (SPTs) involve encoding information by physically performing actions associated with it.
  • The extent to which levels-of-processing effects apply to SPTs compared to standard verbal learning tasks (VTs) is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the magnitude of levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks (SPTs) versus traditional verbal learning tasks (VTs).
  • To examine how surface versus conceptual orienting tasks influence recall in both SPT and VT conditions.
  • To understand the underlying mechanisms responsible for any observed differences in memory effects between SPTs and VTs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using action phrases as learning material.
  • Participants were assigned to either a subject-performed task (SPT) or a verbal learning task (VT) condition.
  • Within each condition, participants used either a surface or a conceptual orienting task during encoding.

Main Results:

  • Both SPT and VT conditions showed better recall with conceptual than surface orienting tasks, confirming a levels-of-processing effect.
  • However, the levels-of-processing effect was significantly reduced in the SPT condition compared to the VT condition.
  • Items encoded via surface tasks in SPTs were recalled substantially well, nearly as effectively as conceptually encoded items in VTs.

Conclusions:

  • The reduced levels-of-processing effect in SPTs arises because performing an action necessitates conceptual processing, even with a surface-level instruction.
  • A small conceptual advantage persists in SPTs because the action component leads to less integration into memory compared to focusing solely on semantic context.
  • This lower integration in SPTs, even with conceptual processing, reduces item accessibility, particularly under verbal surface encoding tasks.