Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiographic densitometric evaluation of seven processing solutions.

Manson-Hing, P Y Monnier

    Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology
    |March 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [A new technic for the radiography of the mandibular ascending rami using the Panorex].

    Actualites odonto-stomatologiques·1981
    Same author

    [Localization of impacted teeth].

    Revue d'odonto-stomatologie·1979
    Same author

    [Development of dental radiographs: manual or automatic?].

    Revue d'odonto-stomatologie·1978
    Same author

    [Errors in radiographic interpretation].

    Dental Cadmos·1978
    Same author

    [Interpretation errors in radiography].

    Revue d'odonto-stomatologie·1977

    Fast film processing solutions can cause significant image fogging at higher temperatures. This study compared seven commercial solutions, finding that rapid-processing types were most susceptible to temperature-induced fog, impacting image quality.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Film Processing

    Background:

    • Commercial film processing solutions are essential for medical imaging.
    • Optimizing processing time is a key consideration for efficiency.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the performance of commercially available film processing solutions.
    • To identify potential issues with solutions designed for reduced processing times.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of seven different commercially available film processing solutions.
    • Assessment of image quality, specifically focusing on fog levels.
    • Testing conducted at various temperatures to simulate different processing conditions.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Solutions engineered for faster film processing exhibited increased fogging.
  • Elevated temperatures exacerbated the fogging effect in rapid-processing solutions.
  • Image quality was compromised in solutions prioritizing speed over stability.

    • Conclusions:

    • Film processing solutions designed for reduced times may not be optimal for all conditions.
    • High temperatures can significantly degrade image quality by increasing fog.
    • Careful selection of processing solutions is crucial for maintaining diagnostic image clarity.