Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structural models for intermediate care areas.

D C Cheng1, R J Byrick, E Knobel

  • 1Department of Anaesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada.

Critical Care Medicine
|November 5, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Guidelines of Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia for Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (II Edition, 2007) 2013-2014 Update].

Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia·2014
Same author

Thixotropy.

International journal of cosmetic science·2009
Same author

Double-lumen central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine to prevent catheter colonisation in the intensive care unit setting: a prospective randomised study.

The Journal of hospital infection·2009
Same author

Postoperative intensive care in cardiac surgery.

Current opinion in anaesthesiology·2006
Same author

Successful treatment of colon cancer related right heart thromboemboli with prolonged intravenous streptokinase during serial TOE monitoring.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2005
Same author

Pulmonary fat embolism and intraosseous infusion.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies·2003
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Attracting Emergency Medicine Graduates to Surgical Critical Care Training Programs.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond a Snapshot: Tracking Family Prognostic Expectations in the ICU.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Plasma Levels of Soluble ST2 Reflect Extrapulmonary Organ Dysfunction and Predict Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Failure: Beware of Potential Confounders.

Critical care medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study outlines three structural models for intermediate care units (ICAs) for critically ill patients. Each model offers unique benefits and drawbacks, aiding institutions in optimizing critical care resource utilization.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Healthcare Management
  • Hospital Operations

Background:

  • Intermediate care units (ICAs) play a crucial role in managing critically ill patients.
  • Optimizing the structure of ICAs is essential for efficient healthcare delivery.
  • Understanding different ICA models can improve patient outcomes and resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and analyze distinct structural models of intermediate care units for critically ill patients.
  • To provide a comparative overview of various ICA organizational frameworks.
  • To inform decision-making regarding the implementation of ICAs.

Main Methods:

  • Description of three distinct multidisciplinary intermediate care units.
  • Analysis of varying structures and functions within these ICAs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of advantages and limitations for each model.

    • Main Results:

    • Three primary structural models were identified: the conventional isolated ICA, the parallel ICA, and the integrated ICA.
    • Each model presents specific advantages and limitations regarding operational efficiency and patient care.
    • The study details the unique characteristics of each structural approach.

    Conclusions:

    • No single ICA model is universally superior; selection depends on institutional needs and circumstances.
    • All three described structural models have the potential to enhance the utilization of critical care resources.
    • Tailoring ICA structure to institutional context is key for maximizing benefits.