Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computerized tomography scan interpretation of a bone expansion technique.

R A Borgner1, L T Kirkos, R Gougaloff

  • 1Implant Reconstructive Center, St Petersburg, FL 33713, USA.

The Journal of Oral Implantology
|November 7, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone expansion techniques reduce need for grafting.

Dental implantology update·1997
Same author

The changing presentations of diabetic ketoacidosis during pregnancy.

American journal of perinatology·1996
Same author

Safety of long-term flecainide and propafenone in the management of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: report from the Flecainide and Propafenone Italian Study Investigators.

The American journal of cardiology·1996
Same author

Clinical experience and statistical analysis of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla.

The Journal of oral implantology·1996
Same author

Safety of flecainide versus propafenone for the long-term management of symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Report from the Flecainide and Propafenone Italian Study (FAPIS) Group.

European heart journal·1995
Same author

Clinical and statistical analysis of a comprehensive implant reconstructive practice.

Dental economics - oral hygiene·1995
Same journal

A Novel Autologous Root Slice Replantation Technique Applied for Immediate Implantation of Maxillary Central Incisors: A Case Report With 6-Year Review.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Bone Regeneration Techniques for Dental Implant Placement Comparing the Effect of Graft Material on Bone Volume and Long-Term Graft Stability: A Systematic Review.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Preemptive Analgesia With Steroidal and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Dental Implant Surgeries: A Systematic Review.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Recruitment of Rat Bone Marrow-Derived Cells to Dental Implants Immediately After Installation.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Impact of Operator Experience on Accuracy and Procedure Time in Dynamic Navigation, Static-Guided, Freehand Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
Same journal

Implant Education: Practical Hands-On Training.

The Journal of oral implantology·2026
See all related articles

Bone expansion allows implant placement without bone removal, reducing grafting needs and surgical costs. This technique enhances bone structure and soft tissues, preserving cortical bone for better implant outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oral surgery
  • Dental implantology
  • Bone augmentation

Background:

  • Dental implants require adequate bone volume for successful osseointegration.
  • Narrow or atrophic alveolar ridges often necessitate bone grafting procedures prior to implant placement.
  • Traditional grafting methods can increase surgical time, cost, and patient morbidity.

Observation:

  • Bone expansion is a surgical technique to widen alveolar bone without removing native bone.
  • This manipulation creates a receptor site suitable for dental implant placement.
  • The technique preserves the periosteum, maintaining cortical bone integrity.

Findings:

  • Bone expansion significantly reduces or eliminates the need for ridge augmentation, even in severely narrow ridges (1 mm).

Related Experiment Videos

  • The procedure leads to decreased surgical time and reduced treatment costs for patients.
  • It facilitates improved atrophic arch morphology and interarch relationships.
  • Simultaneous soft tissue revision ensures adequate keratinized tissue around the implant, avoiding secondary procedures.

    • Implications:

    • Bone expansion offers a less invasive and more cost-effective alternative to traditional bone grafting for dental implants.
    • Preservation of cortical bone and enhanced soft tissue management contribute to improved long-term implant stability and aesthetics.
    • This technique expands treatment options for patients with limited bone volume, enhancing restorative outcomes.