Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Separate memory-related processing for auditory frequency and patterns.

C Alain1, A Achim, D L Woods

  • 1Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, North York, Ontario, Canada. calain@rotman-baycrest.on.ca

Psychophysiology
|November 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Yield Loss Assessment in Canola: Effects of Brown Girdling Root Rot and Maggot Damage on Single Plant Yield.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Incidental Discovery of Multiple Myeloma, Presenting as an Amyloid Tumor with Plasmacytic Elements of the Thoracic Wall.

Romanian journal of internal medicine = Revue roumaine de medecine interne·2015
Same author

Addressing poor maternal and fetal outcomes.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2012
Same author

Intermodal attention modulates visual processing in dorsal and ventral streams.

NeuroImage·2012
Same author

Efficacy of tailored computer-based neurorehabilitation for improvement of movement initiation in Parkinson's disease.

Brain research·2012
Same author

A clinical trial comparing pantoprazole and esomeprazole to explore the concept of achieving 'complete remission' in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2007
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Detecting auditory deviance relies on neural processing, with distinct brain circuits for frequency and pattern changes. This study reveals separate memory-based processing for auditory frequency and patterns, influencing deviance detection.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Auditory deviance detection is crucial for identifying meaningful sounds.
  • Transient neural representations of preceding stimuli are essential for this process.
  • The neural circuitry for deviance detection may vary based on the type of auditory deviation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the neural circuitry for auditory deviance detection differs based on deviance type (frequency vs. pattern).
  • To explore the generator sources of mismatch negativity (MMN) for different deviance types.

Main Methods:

  • Participants listened to auditory sequences with either frequency or pattern deviant tones.
  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) was measured using electroencephalography (EEG).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Principal component analysis (PCA) and signal identification methods were used to analyze MMN generators.
  • Main Results:

    • Both frequency- and pattern-deviant stimuli elicited MMN.
    • MMN amplitude distribution was more frontal for frequency-deviant stimuli compared to pattern-deviant stimuli.
    • Analysis indicated distinct generator sources for frequency and pattern deviance MMNs, with no common signal space.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory deviance detection involves separate memory-related processing for frequency and patterns.
    • The neural circuits underlying deviance detection are modulated by the perceptual context.
    • These findings suggest distinct neural mechanisms for processing different types of auditory deviance.