Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy.

A Park1, M Marcaccio, M Sternbach

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington 40536-0084, USA. apark@pop.uky.edu

Archives of Surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
|November 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The 201 Trial: a placebo-controlled randomized phase 2 study of safety and tolerance of the c-Abl kinase inhibitor risvodetinib in untreated Parkinson's disease.

Nature aging·2026
Same author

Associations of General and Multiracial-Specific Discrimination with Psychological Distress and Substance Use in Multiracial College Students.

Substance use & misuse·2025
Same author

Incidence of gestational diabetes in pregnant women with a history of bariatric surgery using a service evaluation.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2025
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum: Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of Bariatric Physicians and Surgeons, Canadian Association of General Surgeons, Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons, Canadian Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Vancouver, BC, Sept. 17-21, 2013.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2025
Same author

The effect of psychiatric decision unit services on inpatient admissions and mental health presentations in emergency departments: an interrupted time series analysis from two cities and one rural area in England - CORRIGENDUM.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2024
Same author

The role of emotional cues in event-based prospective memory.

Neuroscience letters·2023
Same journal

The White Test: A New Dye Test for Intraoperative Detection of Bile Leakage During Major Liver Resection-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017
Same journal

Use of Vascular Clamping in Hepatic Surgery: Lessons Learned From 1260 Liver Resections-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017
Same journal

Randomized Clinical Trial of Small-Incision and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Cholecystolithiasis: Primary and Clinical Outcomes-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017
Same journal

Liver Resection With a New Multiprobe Bipolar Radiofrequency Device-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017
Same journal

Porcine and Bovine Surgical Products: Jewish, Muslim, and Hindu Perspectives-Invited Critique.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2017
Same journal

Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Transplant as Part of Multimodality Liver-Directed Therapy-Reply.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2016
See all related articles

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is a safe and effective alternative to open splenectomy (OS), offering reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications for patients. This minimally invasive approach also demonstrates a slightly lower overall cost.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Surgical outcomes research
  • Comparative effectiveness studies

Background:

  • Open splenectomy (OS) is a traditional surgical approach for spleen removal.
  • Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has emerged as a potentially less invasive alternative.
  • Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness of LS compared to OS require thorough evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the perioperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) versus open splenectomy (OS).
  • To evaluate the health benefits of LS regarding morbidity, complications, and patient recuperation.
  • To establish a basis for a future prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective comparison of operative and outcome data from LS patients against historical controls of OS patients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collection and patient evaluation occurred at three university teaching hospitals.
  • 147 LS patients were matched with 63 OS patients based on key demographic and clinical factors.

    • Main Results:

    • LS had a longer operative time but significantly less intraoperative blood loss compared to OS.
    • LS patients experienced significantly shorter postoperative hospital stays and fewer perioperative complications.
    • The mean weighted cost for LS without complications was slightly lower than for OS.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) offers significant advantages over open splenectomy (OS), including reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications.
    • While LS may have a longer operative time, its overall benefits and cost-effectiveness are favorable.
    • Further investigation via a prospective, randomized, controlled trial is recommended to definitively compare these surgical techniques.