Related Experiment Videos
A new classification for malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base
G Cantú1, C L Solero, L Mariani
1Unit of Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. licitra@istitutotumori.mi.it
Objectives:
To propose our clinical classification of malignant ethmoid tumors and to compare it with the last American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) classification, published in 1997.
Design:
Retrospective review.
Setting:
Tertiary cancer facility.
Patients:
We evaluated 123 consecutive patients undergoing craniofacial resection for malignant ethmoid tumors involving the anterior skull base. The mean follow-up was 60 months. Fifty-nine patients (48%) presented with recurrent disease after prior therapy. We classified them with a new classification system (Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori) based on the most commonly accepted unfavorable prognostic factors (involvement of dura mater; intradural extension; involvement of the orbit and, in particular, of its apex; invasion of maxillary, frontal, and/or sphenoid sinuses; and invasion of the infratemporal fossa and skin. We also classified patients with the AJCC classification published in 1997.
Main Outcome Measures:
Disease-free status and overall survival rate. To study a possible association with tumor stage, the Cox regression model was adopted.
Results:
According to our classification, patient distribution by tumor type was T2, n = 46; T3, n = 29; and T4, n = 48 (no T1 tumors were present in the series). For previously untreated patients, 5-year disease-free survival estimates were T2, 57%; T3, 50%; and T4, 13%. For relapses, corresponding figures were T2, 31%; T3, 23%; and T4, 1%. The prognostic difference among stages was statistically significant (P<.001). Similar results were obtained for overall survival. In contrast, patient distribution among different AJCC stages was less balanced, and we failed to detect a significant association with the clinical outcome using this classification.
Conclusion:
We propose the use of our staging system by all those specialists in the field willing to validate the classification and possibly apply it for clinical and investigational purposes.