Related Experiment Videos
A model for improving coverage policy decisions
R Priester1, K G Gervais, D E Vawter
1Minnesota Center for Health Care Ethics, Minneapolis, USA. rjpriester@worldnet.att.net
Abstract:
Reasoned and defensible coverage decisions are essential for a fairer and more efficient healthcare system. Because healthcare resources are finite, coverage decisions should be informed by economic evaluations and made from a perspective that attends to the interests of both individuals and the population enrolled in a plan as a whole. Coverage decisions for all healthcare interventions should follow a 2-step procedure that consists of (1) the relatively impartial and objective assessment of an intervention's eligibility for coverage and (2) the distinctively value-laden determination (for which the enrolled population's values and preferences should take priority) to cover, conditionally cover, or not cover an intervention.