Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A model for improving coverage policy decisions.

R Priester1, K G Gervais, D E Vawter

  • 1Minnesota Center for Health Care Ethics, Minneapolis, USA. rjpriester@worldnet.att.net

The American Journal of Managed Care
|November 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic testing of banked umbilical cord blood.

Cytotherapy·2010
Same author

Studying neurosurgical implants for Parkinson disease: a question of design.

Neurology·2006
Same author

Is the experimental treatment exclusion used appropriately?

Minnesota medicine·2000
Same author

Use of placebo surgery in controlled trials of a cellular-based therapy for Parkinson's disease.

The New England journal of medicine·1999
Same author

The human B cell response to IL-13 is dependent on cellular phenotype as well as mode of activation.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·1999
Same author

A study of healthcare professionals' perspectives about a cross-cultural ethical conflict involving a Hmong patient and her family.

The Journal of clinical ethics·1998
Same journal

Prescription drug prior authorization: costs to pharmacies and physicians.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

Combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy impact on opioid use disorder treatment.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

The societal costs of food insecurity: implications for managed care strategies.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

Availability of hospital financial assistance documents in non-English languages.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

Real-world weight loss with injectable semaglutide vs dulaglutide for diabetes.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

Social needs screening and supplemental benefits in Medicare Advantage.

The American journal of managed care·2026
See all related articles

Informed healthcare coverage decisions require economic evaluations and a two-step process. This ensures fairness and efficiency by balancing individual and population interests for resource allocation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Healthcare Policy
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Healthcare resources are finite, necessitating careful allocation.
  • Coverage decisions impact both individual patients and the broader enrolled population.
  • Economic evaluations are crucial for informed decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a structured framework for healthcare coverage decisions.
  • To emphasize the importance of economic evaluations and population values.
  • To advocate for a two-step process in determining healthcare intervention coverage.

Main Methods:

  • A two-step procedure for coverage decisions is outlined.
  • Step 1 involves an objective assessment of intervention eligibility.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Step 2 focuses on a value-laden determination prioritizing population preferences.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed framework promotes reasoned and defensible coverage decisions.
    • It integrates economic evaluations with population values and preferences.
    • The approach aims for a fairer and more efficient healthcare system.

    Conclusions:

    • Coverage decisions should be guided by economic evaluations and a two-step process.
    • Prioritizing the enrolled population's values is essential for the second step.
    • This systematic approach enhances healthcare resource allocation and system fairness.