Differences in bioavailability between oral cyclosporine formulations in maintenance renal transplant patients

Previous studies of healthy volunteers and small numbers of transplant recipients have suggested that the oral solution formulation of Sandimmune (cyclosporine [CsA]; Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) is bioequivalent to the soft gelatin capsule (SGC) formulation. However, there is conflicting evidence as to whether the two formulations are bioequivalent in all patients; to date, there are no published studies that explicitly address their bioequivalence in patients. We conducted a randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period, crossover study. Of 20 maintenance renal transplant recipients shown by a screening pharmacokinetic (PK) profile to be poor absorbers of CsA, half were randomized to receive first the SGC formulation and half the oral solution formulation for a period of 7 days. Each patient then underwent a 12-hour PK profile on the last day of the assigned formulation before a crossover to receive the other formulation and repeat the 7-day treatment and PK profile cycle. The results showed that peak and total exposure to CsA was greater with the SGC formulation. The SGC-oral solution ratios indicated an average 38% greater peak and 11% greater total exposure for the SGC formulation (P < 0.01 and P = 0.09, respectively). Trough levels were more similar between formulations, with SGC showing an average of 5% greater troughs (P > 0.10). In our selected population of malabsorbers, the SGC formulation made a difference in drug exposure.