Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026
Tumor Engraftment in a Xenograft Mouse Model of Human Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Published on: March 30, 2018
Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma: A clinical comparison of nodal and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue types.
B N Nathwani1, J R Anderson, J O Armitage
1University of Southern California (USC) and Los Angeles County+USC Healthcare Network, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Purpose:
In the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of lymphoma, extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type is listed as a distinctive entity. However, nodal MZL is listed as a provisional entity because of questions as to whether it is truly a disease or just an advanced stage of MALT-type MZL. To resolve the issue of whether primary nodal MZL without involvement of mucosal sites exists and whether it is clinically different from extranodal MALT-type lymphoma, we compared the clinical features of these two lymphomas.
Patients And Methods:
Five expert hematopathologists reached a consensus diagnosis of MZL in 93 patients. Seventy-three were classified as having MALT-type MZL because of involvement of a mucosal site at the time of diagnosis, and 20 were classified as having nodal MZL because of involvement of lymph nodes without involvement of a mucosal site.
Results:
A comparison of the clinical features of nodal MZL and MALT-type MZL showed that more patients with nodal MZL presented with advanced-stage disease (71% v 34%; P =. 02), peripheral lymphadenopathy (100% v 8%; P <.001), and para-aortic lymphadenopathy (56% v 14%; P <.001) than those with MALT-type MZL. However, fewer patients with nodal MZL had a large mass (> or = 5 cm) than those with MALT-type MZL (31% v 68%; P =.03). The 5-year overall survival of patients with nodal MZL was lower than that for patients with MALT-type MZL (56% v 81%; P =.09), with a similar result for failure-free survival (28% v 65%; P =.01). Comparisons of patients with International Prognostic Index scores of 0 to 3 showed that those with nodal MZL had lower 5-year overall survival (52% v 88%; P =.025) and failure-free survival (30% v 75%; P =.007) rates than those with MALT-type MZL.
Conclusion:
Nodal MZL seems to be a distinctive disease entity rather than an advanced stage of MALT-type MZL because the clinical presentations and survival outcomes are different in these two types of MZL. Clinically, nodal MZL is similar to other low-grade, node-based B-cell lymphomas, such as follicular and small lymphocytic lymphomas.
