Related Experiment Videos
Ankle arthrodesis: internal non-compression arthrodesis versus internal compression arthrodesis
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Abstract:
Ankle arthrodesis is still considered to be the standard treatment for most disabling types of ankle arthritis, but fusion methods are varied. We report our experience of ankle arthrodesis and compare a group of 34 cases treated by Blair's non-compression arthrodesis to another group of 32 cases treated by internal compression arthrodesis using two crossed screws. The same surgeon performed all the operations. The Blair's non-compression arthrodesis group included 21 males and 13 females with an average age of 42 y/o (range 18-70 y/o) and an average follow up period of 38.6 months (range 26-62 months). The union rate was 91.2% and the average union time was 5.6 months (range 2-10 months). There were three cases of non-union. The cross-screw compression arthrodesis group included 20 males and 12 females with an average age of 45 y/o (range 20-86 y/o) and an average follow up period of 38.3 months (range 15-81 months). The union rate was 96.9% and the average union time was 2.7 months (range 1.5-4.4 months). There was one case of non-union. We conclude that our cross-screws compression arthrodesis with its shorter fusion time was found to be superior to the Blair's non-compression arthrodesis.