Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2026

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization
Published on: February 3, 2013
A comparison of two indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data
O E Gaggiotti1, O Lange, K Rassmann
1Department of Zoology, University of Cmabridge, UK. oeg20@cam.ac.uk
Abstract:
We compare the performance of Nm estimates based on FST and RST obtained from microsatellite data using simulations of the stepwise mutation model with range constraints in allele size classes. The results of the simulations suggest that the use of microsatellite loci can lead to serious overestimations of Nm, particularly when population sizes are large (N > 5000) and range constraints are high (K < 20). The simulations also indicate that, when population sizes are small (N = 500) and migration rates are moderate (Nm approximately 2), violations to the assumption used to derive the Nm estimators lead to biased results. Under ideal conditions, i.e. large sample sizes (ns >/= 50) and many loci (nl >/= 20), RST performs better than FST for most of the parameter space. However, FST-based estimates are always better than RST when sample sizes are moderate or small (ns = 10) and the number of loci scored is low (nl < 20). These are the conditions under which many real investigations are carried out and therefore we conclude that in many cases the most conservative approach is to use FST.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Gene Flow
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

