Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Predictors of the long-term outcome after combined aortic and mitral valve surgery
1Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. juraj.turina@dim.usz.ch
Insights
Preoperative myocardial function is key for long-term survival after combined aortic and mitral valve surgery. Early valve replacement is recommended before heart muscle function declines, as tricuspid surgery impacts survival.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Valve Disease
- Prognostic Factors
Background:
- Long-term prognosis after combined aortic and mitral valve surgery is not well understood.
- Factors influencing outcomes include clinical, hemodynamic, and surgical procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify predictors of long-term survival after combined aortic and mitral valve surgery.
- To evaluate the impact of preoperative conditions and surgical interventions on patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 170 patients undergoing combined aortic and mitral valve surgery between 1975 and 1989.
- Average follow-up of 10.6 years, assessing survival and reoperation rates.
- Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify predictors of late survival.
Main Results:
- Perioperative mortality was 4%; 10- and 20-year survival rates were 61% and 33%.
- Independent predictors of late survival included preoperative ejection fraction, age at surgery, and tricuspid surgery.
- Additional tricuspid valve surgery significantly decreased late survival.
Conclusions:
- Preoperative myocardial function (ejection fraction) is the primary predictor of long-term survival.
- Valve replacement is crucial before myocardial function deteriorates to improve outcomes.
- Combined aortic and mitral valve disease with additional tricuspid valve involvement negatively impacts survival.
Background:
The influence of preoperative clinical, hemodynamic, and surgical procedures on long-term prognosis after combined aortic and mitral valve surgery is not well known.
Methods And Results:
One hundred seventy patients (mean age, 50.5 years; 102 men and 68 women) who underwent surgery for chronic combined aortic and mitral valvular disease between 1975 and 1989 were followed up for an average of 10.6 years. Additional repair of tricuspid valve was performed in 29 patients (17%), and aortocoronary bypass graft surgery was performed in 7 patients (4.1%). The perioperative mortality rate was 4%, and 10- and 20-year survival rates were 61% and 33%. Only 12 of 94 deaths (11%) were non-cardiac related. At 10 and 20 years, 57% and 21% of patients were free of reoperation, respectively. The main predictors of late survival in univariate analysis were age at surgery (P=0.0002), preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.002), cardiac index (P=0.007), tricuspid surgery (P=0.03), pulmonary vascular resistance (P=0.03), NYHA class (P=0.04), and additional aortocoronary bypass graft surgery (P=0.04). Duration of symptoms, gender, cause of valvular disease, and type of prosthesis were not predictive of postoperative outcome. In multivariate stepwise Cox analysis, ejection fraction (P=0.0008), age at surgery (P=0.0011), and tricuspid surgery (P=0. 007) were independent predictors of late survival.
Conclusions:
In combined aortic and mitral valve disease, preoperative myocardial function is the main predictor of long-term survival. Low operative mortality rates and good late outcome make valve replacement mandatory before deterioration of myocardial function occurs. Additional tricuspid valve disease requiring surgery significantly decreases the late survival rate.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

