Related Experiment Videos
Use of cefazolin for peritonitis treatment in peritoneal dialysis patients
M Agraharkar1, P Klevjer-Anderson, E Rubinstien
1Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0562, USA.
Abstract:
For over two decades, intraperitoneal administration of vancomycin and an aminoglycoside has been an accepted regimen for the empiric treatment of peritonitis in the peritoneal dialysis patient, until definite identification of the organism has been made. The recent emergence of vancomycin-resistant organisms has been of great concern in many centers. The current treatment recommendation therefore is to use cefazolin in place of vancomycin. We analyzed peritonitis data from January 1, 1996 to June 30, 1997, prior to switching over to cefazolin. Seventy-five percent (27 episodes) in 1997 as compared to 78% in 1996 were due to gram-positive organisms. Twenty-two percent (8 episodes) were due to gram- negative organisms in 1997, 21% in 1996, and 3% (1 episode) due to yeast in 1997, 3% in 1996. Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) caused 33% of the gram-positive peritonitis episodes in 1997 as compared to 37% in 1996. Twenty-two percent of the gram-positive episodes were due to Staphylococcus aureus (SA) in 1997 and 46% in 1996. Enterococcal infections were 26% in 1997 and 1% in 1996. All of these were confined to only 1 patient. The antibiogram revealed 100% sensitivity of both SA and SE to vancomycin and 100% sensitivity of SA to cefazolin, but only 11% sensitivity of SE to cefazolin. The same patient population had a 48% sensitivity of SE to cefazolin in 1996, showing a sudden and substantial increase in resistance to SE. Even though SE is thought to be a less virulent organism, treating patients with a high probability of being infected by SE with an antibiotic showing 89% resistance is not warranted.
Insights
Vancomycin resistance is a growing concern in peritoneal dialysis patients. A study found Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) showed 89% resistance to cefazolin, questioning its use for empiric peritonitis treatment.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Microbiology
Background:
- Intraperitoneal vancomycin and aminoglycoside were standard empiric treatment for peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.
- Emergence of vancomycin-resistant organisms necessitates alternative treatment strategies.
- Cefazolin is now recommended empirically, replacing vancomycin.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze peritonitis data before the switch to cefazolin.
- To evaluate the susceptibility of common pathogens to vancomycin and cefazolin.
- To assess the appropriateness of cefazolin as an empiric treatment for PD peritonitis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of peritonitis episodes from January 1, 1996, to June 30, 1997.
- Categorization of infections by organism type (Gram-positive, Gram-negative, yeast).
- Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA) against vancomycin and cefazolin.
Main Results:
- Gram-positive organisms were the predominant cause of peritonitis (75-78%).
- Staphylococcus epidermidis (SE) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA) were key Gram-positive pathogens.
- Antibiogram revealed 100% sensitivity of SE and SA to vancomycin.
- Cefazolin showed 100% sensitivity for SA but only 11% for SE in 1997, a significant decrease from 48% in 1996.
Conclusions:
- High cefazolin resistance in SE (89%) raises concerns about its empiric use.
- Vancomycin remains highly effective against SE and SA.
- Current recommendations for empiric cefazolin treatment in PD peritonitis may need re-evaluation due to rising SE resistance.