Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationships.

American Journal of Orthodontics

|September 1, 1975

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Trp128Tyr mutation in the N-lobe of recombinant human serum transferrin: 1H- and 15N-NMR and metal binding studies.

Protein engineering·1997

Same author

Interlobe communication in 13C-methionine-labeled human transferrin.

Biochemistry·1996

Same journal

Recent advances in bacterial chemotherapy; the sulfonamides.

American journal of orthodontics·2010

Same journal

Factors modifying head form in man.

American journal of orthodontics·2010

Same journal

The advisability of extraction as a therapeutic aid in orthodontics; affirmative.

American journal of orthodontics·2010

Same journal

Lesions of the mandible; secondary carcinoma of the mandible.

American journal of orthodontics·2010

Same journal

Salivary gland tumors.

American journal of orthodontics·2010

Same journal

Extensive ameloblastoma.

American journal of orthodontics·2010

See all related articles

The ANB angle measurement has limitations in assessing apical base divergence due to growth and treatment variations. A new linear measurement, A-D

Area of Science:

Orthodontics
Craniofacial Growth
Cephalometric Analysis

Background:

The ANB angle is a common cephalometric measurement used to assess sagittal discrepancies in the apical bases.
Previous studies have highlighted geometric limitations and landmark variability affecting the accuracy of the ANB measurement.
Growth and orthodontic treatment mechanics can influence the reliability of traditional angular measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the accuracy of the ANB difference in determining apical base divergence.
To introduce and validate a new linear measurement method (AXD and A-D') for assessing apical base relationships.
To compare the efficacy of linear measurements against angular measurements in evaluating treatment changes.

Main Methods:

Development and application of the AXD angle method, eliminating nasion and point B variables.

Related Experiment Videos

Introduction of linear measurements, specifically A-D', to quantify actual apical base distance.

Analysis of pre- and posttreatment cephalometric data from 50 Class II malocclusion cases.

Main Results:

The ANB measurement showed significant variations due to growth and treatment mechanics, limiting its accuracy.
The AXD angle demonstrated a significant correlation with linear measurements of apical base difference.
Linear measurements, particularly A-D', provided a more accurate assessment of apical base relationships and treatment changes.
Point A remained stable during Class II treatment, suggesting treatment mechanics stabilize rather than reposition it.
The A-D' measurement decreased by 15.8% post-treatment, while ANB decreased by 43.1%, highlighting the accuracy of A-D'.

Conclusions:

The ANB difference is not consistently accurate for assessing apical base divergence.
Linear measurements, such as A-D', offer a more reliable method for evaluating apical base relationships and treatment outcomes.
Linear measurements are crucial for accurately assessing pre- and posttreatment changes, accounting for facial growth variations.