Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026
Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: November 1, 2010
Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial
G J Kuperman1, J M Teich, M J Tanasijevic
1Partners HealthCare System, Department of Information Systems, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA. gkuperman@partners.org
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of an automatic alerting system on the time until treatment is ordered for patients with critical laboratory results.
Design:
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Intervention:
A computer system to detect critical conditions and automatically notify the responsible physician via the hospital's paging system.
Patients:
Medical and surgical inpatients at a large academic medical center. One two-month study period for each service.
Main Outcomes:
Interval from when a critical result was available for review until an appropriate treatment was ordered. Secondary outcomes were the time until the critical condition resolved and the frequency of adverse events.
Methods:
The alerting system looked for 12 conditions involving laboratory results and medications. For intervention patients, the covering physician was automatically notified about the presence of the results. For control patients, no automatic notification was made. Chart review was performed to determine the outcomes.
Results:
After exclusions, 192 alerting situations (94 interventions, 98 controls) were analyzed. The intervention group had a 38 percent shorter median time interval (1.0 hours vs. 1.6 hours, P = 0.003; mean, 4.1 vs. 4.6 hours, P = 0.003) until an appropriate treatment was ordered. The time until the alerting condition resolved was less in the intervention group (median, 8.4 hours vs. 8.9 hours, P = 0.11; mean, 14.4 hours vs. 20.2 hours, P = 0.11), although these results did not achieve statistical significance. The impact of the intervention was more pronounced for alerts that did not meet the laboratory's critical reporting criteria. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of adverse events.
Conclusion:
An automatic alerting system reduced the time until an appropriate treatment was ordered for patients who had critical laboratory results. Information technologies that facilitate the transmission of important patient data can potentially improve the quality of care.
More Related Videos
14:14Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications
Published on: February 28, 2014
08:58Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
Published on: October 17, 2025
