Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Discrepant analysis: a biased and an unscientific method for estimating test sensitivity and specificity.

A Hadgu1

  • 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|December 2, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Discrepant analysis for infectious disease tests, like DNA-amplification assays, overestimates test accuracy. This method is scientifically flawed and should not be used for evaluating diagnostic or screening tests.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seasonal patterns of tuberculosis case notification in the tropics of Africa: A six-year trend analysis in Ethiopia.

PloS one·2018
Same author

Reproducibility and specificity concerns associated with nucleic acid amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology·2008
Same author

Prevalence of genital chlamydial infection in young women entering a national job training program, 1990-1997.

American journal of public health·2001
Same author

A GEE approach to estimating sensitivity and specificity and coverage properties of the confidence intervals.

Statistics in medicine·2001
Same author

Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a diagnostic test by A. Alonzo and M. Pepe, Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18: 2987-3003.

Statistics in medicine·2001
Same author

Discrepant analysis is an inappropriate and unscientific method.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnostics
  • Infectious disease detection
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Discrepant analysis is commonly used to evaluate diagnostic tests, particularly DNA-amplification assays for infectious diseases.
  • Recent claims suggested discrepant analysis yields unbiased specificity estimates compared to culture-based methods.
  • These claims are prevalent in the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy for infectious agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the validity and scientific rigor of discrepant analysis in estimating diagnostic test performance.
  • To demonstrate the potential biases and scientific flaws inherent in the discrepant analysis methodology.
  • To challenge the widespread adoption of discrepant analysis for evaluating diagnostic and screening tests.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of a typical published example of discrepant analysis for DNA-amplification tests.
  • Statistical examination of bias in sensitivity and specificity estimates derived from discrepant analysis.
  • Assessment of the methodological principles underlying diagnostic test evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Discrepant analysis significantly overestimates true sensitivity and specificity values for diagnostic tests.
  • The methodology violates the fundamental principle that a new test should not determine disease status.
  • Estimates derived from discrepant analysis exhibit substantial and clinically relevant bias.

Conclusions:

  • The conclusions that discrepant analysis provides unbiased specificity are incorrect.
  • Discrepant analysis is not only biased but fundamentally unscientific.
  • The use of discrepant analysis for evaluating diagnostic or screening tests should be discontinued.