Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Bournewood judgment: a way forward?

D Dickenson1, A Shah

  • 1Imperial College School of Medicine, London.

Medicine, Science, and the Law
|December 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Incidence and survival for gastric and esophageal cancer diagnosed in British Columbia, 1990 to 1999.

Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie·2008
Same author

Severe hyperemesis gravidarum leading to hepatorenal failure, a rare and challenging case.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2008
Same author

Techniques for caesarean section.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2008
Same author

A lifelike patient simulator for teaching robotic colorectal surgery: how to acquire skills for robotic rectal dissection.

Surgical endoscopy·2007
Same author

Homocysteine, migration and early vascular impairment in people of African descent.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2007
Same author

Treatment strategies for Type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Acta chirurgica Belgica·2007
Same journal

The right to die: A comparative analysis of end-of-life issues in Scandinavian legal systems.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Diagnosing autism in adult forensic settings.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Background asbestos fiber levels in autopsy lungs: Implications for forensic disease attribution in the post-ban era.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Changing patterns in volatile substance abuse fatalities: A retrospective case series from Northern Australia.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Integrity, objectivity, and the role of healthcare expert witnesses in the judicial system: An analysis of practice, Indonesian law, and a Foucauldian perspective.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
Same journal

Post-mortem computed tomography findings of spinal column injuries in comparison to autopsy: A systematic review.

Medicine, science, and the law·2026
See all related articles

The House of Lords

Area of Science:

  • Law and Mental Health
  • Medical Law
  • Human Rights Law

Background:

  • The article discusses the 1998 House of Lords decision in Regina v. Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust, Ex parte L.
  • This case involved complex legal reasoning regarding patient rights and mental health treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the legal reasoning behind the Law Lords' unanimous judgment.
  • To comment on the significant implications of the Bournewood decision.
  • To propose a path forward for resolving practical difficulties in mental health law.

Main Methods:

  • Commentary on a specific legal judgment.
  • Analysis of implications for practitioners and patient rights.
  • Review of the 1995 Law Commission incapacity proposals and the 1997 consultation paper 'Who Decides?'.
Keywords:
Legal ApproachMental Health TherapiesProfessional Patient RelationshipR. v. Bournewood Community and Mental Health N.H.S. Trust, ex parte L

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The House of Lords' decision had significant implications, potentially limiting certain patient rights.
  • The 1995 Law Commission proposals offer a potential mechanism to address practical difficulties.
  • The proposed mechanism could reconcile practitioner concerns with patient rights.

Conclusions:

  • The Bournewood decision highlights challenges in balancing mental health treatment with individual liberties.
  • The Law Commission's proposals present a viable framework for future legal and practical solutions.
  • A forward-looking approach is needed to ensure both effective mental healthcare and robust patient rights.