Related Experiment Videos
Fetal Down syndrome screening: a cost effectiveness analysis of alternative screening programs
1Department of OB/GYN, The Stamford Hospital, Connecticut 06904, USA.
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
|December 3, 1999
Summary
The most effective Down syndrome (DS) screening programs combine triple screening (TS) and ultrasound (U/S) for optimal cost-effectiveness and sensitivity. These approaches minimize invasive procedures like amniocentesis (AM) while maximizing Down syndrome detection rates.
Area of Science:
- Prenatal screening and diagnosis
- Maternal-fetal medicine
- Genetics and genomics
Background:
- Fetal Down syndrome (DS) screening is crucial for informed reproductive decisions.
- Current screening methods vary in efficacy and cost.
- Optimizing screening protocols is essential to balance detection rates with resource utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of various fetal Down syndrome screening strategies.
- To evaluate different combinations of maternal age, triple screening (TS), and ultrasound (U/S) markers.
- To identify the most efficient screening program minimizing invasive procedures and costs.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated screening tools: maternal age, triple screening (TS), and ultrasound (U/S) for fetal Down syndrome markers.
- Calculated sensitivity, total cost, cost per case of DS detected (Cost/DS), amniocentesis (AM) losses, and residual risk (RR) for five distinct screening programs.
- Utilized 1988 Illinois delivery statistics for population-based analysis.
Main Results:
- Estimated 260 DS cases in a population of 167,654 women.
- Program sensitivities ranged from 30% to 69%.
- Cost per DS case detected varied significantly, with some programs costing over $200,000, while others were below $150,000.
Conclusions:
- Screening programs incorporating TS for all patients, with selective U/S for women under 35, offer the best balance of sensitivity and cost-effectiveness.
- Program #4 (TS followed by U/S for screen-positive women <35, TS with AM for women >=35) and Program #3 (TS for all, AM for screen-positive) showed promising results.
- These optimized strategies minimize amniocentesis-related losses while maximizing Down syndrome detection.