Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study comparing two techniques.

V De Leo1, P De Palma, A Ditto

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Italy. deleo@unisi.it

European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology
|December 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI: an update in 2025†.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Correction to: The HERA (Hyper‑response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus for the management of hyper‑responders in in vitro fertilization.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2023
Same author

The HERA (Hyper-response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus for the management of hyper-responders in in vitro fertilization.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2023
Same author

Predicting the total number of retrieved oocytes following double ovarian stimulation (DuoStim).

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

The HERA (Hyper-response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus definition of hyper-responders for in-vitro fertilization.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2023
Same author

Comment on: Optic nerve sheath diameter, intensive care unit admission and COVID 19-related-inhospital mortality.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2022

A simplified variant of the intrafascial hysterectomy technique resulted in less blood loss and fewer complications compared to the standard Richardson method. This variant also showed potential for improved long-term outcomes in vaginal vault prolapse and patient function.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Surgery
  • Surgical Techniques
  • Pelvic Anatomy

Background:

  • Abdominal hysterectomy is a common gynecologic procedure.
  • Intrafascial hysterectomy is frequently employed.
  • A simplified variant using an Allis clamp aims to reduce complexity and preserve pelvic structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the Richardson intrafascial hysterectomy technique with a simplified variant.
  • To evaluate differences in surgical outcomes, complications, and long-term functional results.

Main Methods:

  • Randomized controlled trial of 262 women (1991-1995).
  • 133 underwent Richardson technique, 129 underwent variant technique.
  • Statistical analysis included two-tailed student test and chi2 analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The variant technique showed significantly less blood loss (P<0.01) and no intraoperative complications, unlike the Richardson group (1 ureter lesion).
  • No differences in hospitalization duration were observed.
  • The variant group had a non-significant trend towards reduced vaginal vault prolapse at 36 months and reported better sexual and urinary function.

Conclusions:

  • The variant hysterectomy technique is a valid alternative to the Richardson technique.
  • It offers the advantage of preserving anatomical relationships and has fewer minor delayed complications.
  • The variant technique may lead to improved patient outcomes regarding prolapse and function.