Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Induction with cross-classified categories.

G L Murphy1, B H Ross

  • 1University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA. gmurphy@s.psych.uiuc.edu

Memory & Cognition
|December 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Induction and category coherence.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Lung lesions in SCID-bo and SCID-bg mice after intratracheal inoculation with wild-type or leucotoxin-deficient mutant strains of Mannheimia haemolytica serotype 1.

Journal of comparative pathology·2006
Same author

Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: a test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Abstract coherent categories.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

A genotypically unique Babesia gibsoni-like parasite recovered from a dog in Oklahoma.

The Journal of parasitology·2001
Same author

Thematic relations in adults' concepts.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2001
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

People often struggle to combine information from multiple categories when making inferences about cross-classified items. Manipulating attention to critical features can improve the use of multiple categories in decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Categorization

Background:

  • Categories facilitate inferences about new objects.
  • Most real-world objects belong to multiple, overlapping categories (cross-classification).
  • Understanding how people utilize cross-classified category information for inference is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how individuals make inferences when presented with cross-classified category information.
  • To determine if people effectively combine information from multiple categories for object inference.
  • To identify factors that influence the utilization of multiple category sources.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted using food categories known for cross-classification (e.g., bagel as bread and breakfast food).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants received fictitious facts about two categories an item belonged to.
  • Inferences were requested about the item based on the provided category information.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant increase in the use of multiple categories was observed in cross-classification compared to ambiguous classification.
    • Procedural manipulations significantly enhanced the use of both categories.
    • Focusing participant attention on critical features within each category was key.

    Conclusions:

    • Individuals do not automatically integrate information from multiple, cross-classified categories during inference.
    • Attention to critical category features is a significant factor in leveraging cross-classified information.
    • Further research can explore methods to improve multi-category inference.