Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Operative sperm retrieval - the urological aspects].

H Sperling1

  • 1Urologische Klinik der Universität Essen.

Der Urologe. Ausg. A
|December 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) are key for male infertility. Percutaneous techniques like PESA and PTESE offer alternatives but require efficacy and safety evaluation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Artificial urinary sphincter in women-too uncommon?]

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2017
Same author

[Side effects of erectile dysfunction drug treatment].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2017
Same author

[Fertility].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2016
Same author

[Emergencies of the external genital area].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2016
Same author

[Reply].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2015
Same author

[Reply].

Der Urologe. Ausg. A·2015

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Urology
  • Andrology

Context:

  • Sperm retrieval techniques are integral to assisted reproduction.
  • Established microsurgical methods include MESA and TESE for azoospermia.
  • Percutaneous techniques (PESA, PTESE) are increasingly utilized, particularly in Anglo-American and Northern European regions.

Purpose:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous sperm retrieval methods (PESA, PTESE) compared to traditional microsurgical approaches (MESA, TESE).
  • To assess the number of spermatozoa retrieved using different sperm retrieval techniques.
  • To investigate the potential testicular injury associated with percutaneous sperm retrieval procedures, whether performed blindly or under ultrasound guidance.

Summary:

  • Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) are standard procedures for non-reconstructable obstructive or testicular azoospermia in assisted reproduction.
  • Percutaneous techniques, such as percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) and percutaneous testicular sperm extraction (PTESE), are frequently favored in certain regions.
  • The efficacy, specifically the yield of spermatozoa, and the risk of testicular injury from these percutaneous methods require thorough discussion and comparison.

Impact:

  • Provides crucial data for clinicians selecting the most effective and safest sperm retrieval methods for patients with azoospermia.
  • Contributes to the understanding of potential complications associated with minimally invasive sperm retrieval techniques.
  • Informs patient counseling regarding the risks and benefits of different operative sperm retrieval options in fertility treatments.

Related Experiment Videos