Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Random errors in localization of landmarks in postero-anterior cephalograms.

A E Athanasiou1, R Miethke, A J Van Der Meij

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. aeathan@dent.auth.gr

British Journal of Orthodontics
|December 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Landmark identification in postero-anterior cephalograms (PAC) has significant random error, with digitizing error being negligible. Accuracy varies greatly among landmarks, with some being more reliable for orthodontic analysis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advances in thymic carcinoma diagnosis and treatment: a review of literature.

Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England)·2014
Same author

c-MYC and h-TERT co-expression in colon adenocarcinoma: a tissue microarray digitized image analysis.

Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology·2013
Same author

Cutaneous metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma.

Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology·2013
Same author

Gene numerical imbalances in cytological specimens based on fluorescence/chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis.

Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology·2012
Same author

Primary signet-ring adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder with gastric metastasis or a second primary cancer?

Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology·2012
Same author

Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2011

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Orthodontics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Accurate landmark identification in cephalometric analysis is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • Postero-anterior cephalograms (PAC) are commonly used in orthodontics, but the reliability of landmark localization requires evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the random error associated with identifying common cephalometric landmarks on postero-anterior cephalograms (PAC).
  • To compare the accuracy and reliability of different landmarks and examiners in PAC analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty standardized PACs were analyzed by five examiners who identified 34 landmarks.
  • Landmarks were digitized using an X-Y coordinate system, and accuracy was evaluated through repeated measurements and inter-examiner comparisons.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Digitizing error was found to be insignificant compared to landmark identification errors.
  • Significant variability in accuracy was observed among the 34 landmarks, with mastoid, latero-orbitale, and antegonion landmarks being the most accurate.
  • No significant learning effect or consistent difference in accuracy was found among the examiners.

Conclusions:

  • Random error in landmark identification is a primary source of inaccuracy in PAC analysis.
  • Specific landmarks demonstrate higher reliability, which should be considered in clinical practice and research.
  • Examiner experience does not appear to significantly influence short-term landmark identification accuracy in PAC.