Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Complexity- and risk-adjusted model for measuring surgical outcome.

S B Pillai1, A M van Rij, S Williams

  • 1Department of Surgery, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand.

The British Journal of Surgery
|December 14, 1999
PubMed
Summary

A new, simple, and dynamic surgical risk adjustment model was developed for general surgical audits. This tool effectively predicts surgical morbidity, aiding in performance comparisons between surgical units.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of three targeted approaches to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on cardiovascular risk.

The British journal of surgery·2016
Same author

Aortic aneurysm screening.

The British journal of surgery·2015
Same author

Endothelial cell icam-1 staining in human carotid arteries.

Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology·2015
Same author

Twenty-eight loci that influence serum urate levels: analysis of association with gout.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases·2014
Same author

Evaluation of the accuracy of aorta scan BVI 9600 in screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2014
Same author

Trace element profiles in cancer patients.

Biological trace element research·2013

Area of Science:

  • Surgical outcomes research
  • Health services research
  • Medical informatics

Background:

  • Existing surgical scoring systems are complex and static.
  • There is a need for a simple, dynamic risk adjustment tool for surgical audits.
  • Current systems have limitations in predicting surgical morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a simple, dynamic risk adjustment model for general surgical audits.
  • To improve the prediction of surgical morbidity.
  • To facilitate performance comparisons across surgical units.

Main Methods:

  • Identified 12 prognostic variables from the Otago Surgical Audit data.
  • Used logistic regression to adjust for confounding factors and identify key predictors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Validated the model through back-validation and external validation.

    • Main Results:

    • The final model incorporated all 12 identified variables.
    • Key predictors of postoperative morbidity included operation duration, category, inpatient status, and organ system.
    • The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86, indicating strong predictive power.

    Conclusions:

    • A simple and dynamic model for predicting surgical morbidity has been successfully developed.
    • The model demonstrates comparable predictive power to existing scoring systems.
    • This tool can be integrated into existing audit systems for enhanced surgical unit performance evaluation.