Correcting for ascertainment bias in the COGA data set
Related Experiment Videos
1Department of Genetics, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, TX 78245-0549, USA.
Abstract:
The effects of several corrections for ascertainment bias on a linkage result in the COGA data are examined. A correction that models the complete ascertainment protocol markedly reduces the evidence for linkage. Different partial corrections increase the linkage signal and recover good estimates of the population trait prevalence, but do not represent adequately the complexity of the COGA ascertainment scheme. Evidently the present size of the COGA data set cannot support a complete correction for ascertainment bias, but an effective partial correction can and should be implemented.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Confirmation Biases
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...