Related Experiment Videos
Short- vs. long-range disperser: the evolutionarily stable allocation in a lattice-structured habitat
1Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan.
Journal of Theoretical Biology
|December 22, 1999
Summary
Organism dispersal strategies impact population dynamics. Evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) for resource allocation may differ from those maximizing population density, favoring short-range dispersal due to space occupation advantages.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Mathematical Biology
Background:
- Population dynamics are influenced by dispersal strategies.
- Organisms must balance resource allocation between short- and long-range dispersal.
- Lattice-structured habitats present unique challenges for population spread.
Purpose of the Study:
- To calculate the evolutionarily stable allocation between short- and long-range dispersers.
- To determine invasion conditions for different dispersal strategies.
- To compare ESS allocation with optimal allocation for maximum population density.
Main Methods:
- Pair approximation to derive ordinary differential equations for population densities.
- Analysis of invasibility conditions for population types.
- Derivation of ESS for resource allocation with a linear trade-off.
Main Results:
- ESS resource allocation differs from optimal allocation maximizing population density.
- ESS favors a larger fraction for short-range dispersal compared to optimal.
- Long-range dispersers are more effective at space preoccupation.
Conclusions:
- Dispersal strategy significantly affects population dynamics and stability.
- Evolutionarily stable strategies may not align with maximizing population size.
- Computer simulations confirm theoretical predictions on dispersal strategies.