Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How does human error affect safety in anesthesia?

J S Gravenstein1

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA. jgravens@anest2.anest.ufl.edu

Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
|December 22, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An integrated coronary circulation teaching model.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·2006
Same author

Let no patient be harmed by anesthesia.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·2003
Same author

Safety in anesthesia.

Der Anaesthesist·2002
Same author

Monitoring with our good senses.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1999
Same author

Good common sense--quaint superstition.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1999
Same author

Influence of pulse oximetry and capnography on time to diagnosis of critical incidents in anesthesia: a pilot study using a full-scale patient simulator.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·1999
Same journal

Small Incisions, Big Impact-Robotic Surgery Is Revolutionizing Cancer Care.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

TeleSurgery: The Present and the Future for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive/Robotic Surgery for Colon Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Liver Transplantation.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Anesthesia patient safety is improved by addressing human error and system factors. Modern training, including simulators, helps reduce errors and manage their consequences, enhancing overall care.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Patient Safety
  • Medical Error Analysis

Background:

  • Anesthesia morbidity and mortality rates, though generally acceptable, remain a concern.
  • Human error is a significant contributing factor in many anesthesia-related adverse events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the role of human error in anesthesia mishaps.
  • To highlight the importance of system design and training in mitigating anesthesia risks.

Main Methods:

  • Review of factors contributing to anesthesia morbidity and mortality.
  • Discussion of the impact of medical device design on human error.
  • Analysis of modern training methodologies, including simulation.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Anesthesia errors are often multifactorial, with human error playing a key role.
  • While good equipment design can prevent some errors, system-level attention is crucial.
  • Simulator training effectively reduces error frequency and improves management of adverse events.

Conclusions:

  • Improving anesthesia patient safety requires a dual approach: minimizing human error and optimizing the healthcare system.
  • Advanced training methods are essential for equipping anesthesiologists to handle errors and their consequences effectively.