Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modelling for cost-effectiveness analysis.

L B Russell1

  • 1Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 30 College Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. lrussell@rci.rutgers.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|December 22, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design and rationale of penn medicine healthy heart, a randomized trial of effectiveness of a centrally organized approach to blood pressure and cholesterol improvement among patients at elevated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

American heart journal·2024
Same author

Radiation-induced genetic damage in mice.

Progress in nuclear energy. Series 6 Biological sciences·2014
Same author

An allelic series of mutations in the kit ligand gene of mice. I. Identification of point mutations in seven ethylnitrosourea-induced Kitl(Steel) alleles.

Genetics·2002
Same author

An allelic series of mutations in the Kit ligand gene of mice. II. Effects of ethylnitrosourea-induced Kitl point mutations on survival and peripheral blood cells of Kitl(Steel) mice.

Genetics·2002
Same author

The methodologic partnership of effectiveness reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

American journal of preventive medicine·2001
Same author

Sequence interpretation. Functional annotation of mouse genome sequences.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2001
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Subgroup Analysis of Interval-censored Failure Time Data With Application to Alzheimer's Disease.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Rejoinder to Commentaries on "A Perspective on the Appropriate Implementation of ICH E9(R1) Addendum Strategies for Handling Intercurrent Events".

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Multi-Stage Drop-the-Loser Design With Superiority Boundaries.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable ROI Identification in Brain Image Analysis: Overcoming CNN Black Box Challenges With Kriging-Enhanced Adaptive Sampling.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Cost-effectiveness analysis models require accurate predictions and flexibility. This paper proposes validation methods for costs and highlights the impact of statistical forms on resource allocation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Science
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) models are crucial for decision-making in healthcare.
  • Models must accurately predict costs and effects under various conditions.
  • Current modeling practices may not adequately address cost validation and statistical implications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline key considerations for developing robust CEA models.
  • To propose validation procedures for cost data within models.
  • To examine the influence of statistical forms on model outcomes and resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing modeling frameworks for CEA.
  • Proposal of validation techniques for cost estimates analogous to effectiveness validation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the impact of common statistical methodologies on model predictions.

    • Main Results:

    • Effective validation of cost data is essential for model accuracy.
    • Models need to accurately represent the pathway of costs, similar to effects.
    • Conventional statistical forms can have significant implications for resource allocation decisions.

    Conclusions:

    • Enhanced validation of cost data is needed in CEA modeling.
    • Modelers should prioritize accurate representation of costs alongside effectiveness.
    • Understanding the implications of statistical choices is vital for informed resource allocation.