Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

How to critique qualitative research articles.

C Forchuk¹, J Roberts

¹Hamilton Psychiatric Hospital, Ontario.

The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research = Revue Canadienne De Recherche En Sciences Infirmieres

|January 1, 1993

Summary

Evaluating qualitative research needs specific criteria distinct from quantitative studies. This paper offers guidelines for appraising qualitative research, ensuring rigor and relevance in findings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Establishing an International Psychoanalytic Nurses Alliance [IPNA].

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2026

Same author

Homelessness and housing crises among individuals accessing services within a Canadian emergency department.

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2015

Same author

Integrating an evidence-based intervention into clinical practice: 'transitional relationship model'.

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2012

Same author

Mothers with mental illness experiencing homelessness: a critical analysis.

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2011

Same author

Developing and testing an intervention to prevent homelessness among individuals discharged from psychiatric wards to shelters and 'No Fixed Address'.

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2008

Same author

Perceptions of health and health service utilization among homeless and housed psychiatric consumer/survivors.

Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing·2008

Area of Science:

Social Sciences
Health Sciences
Education

Background:

Qualitative research employs diverse methodologies, complicating critical appraisal for unfamiliar audiences.
Standardized evaluation criteria for qualitative research are often lacking.
Assessing the quality of qualitative research is crucial for its valid application.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a set of guidelines for critically evaluating qualitative research papers.
To assist researchers and consumers in assessing the rigor and relevance of qualitative studies.
To provide a framework for consistent appraisal of diverse qualitative methods.

Main Methods:

The paper outlines key criteria for examining qualitative research.
Guidelines cover topic appropriateness, method fit, literature consistency, and data collection/analysis.
Emphasis is placed on participant description, context, researcher reflexivity, and sound conclusions.

Main Results:

A comprehensive checklist for qualitative research evaluation is presented.
The guidelines address the suitability of the research topic and chosen methodology.
Criteria for information gathering, analysis, and the significance of findings are detailed.

Conclusions:

Adherence to proposed guidelines enhances the critical appraisal of qualitative research.
These criteria facilitate a more consistent and rigorous evaluation of qualitative studies.
The guidelines aim to improve the perceived quality and impact of qualitative research across disciplines.

Related Experiment Videos