Cross axis VOR induced by pursuit training in monkeys: further properties of adaptive responses

We have shown recently in alert monkeys that repeated interaction between the pursuit and vestibular systems in the orthogonal plane induces adaptive changes in the VOR. To examine further properties of adaptive cross axis VOR induced by pursuit training, sinusoidal whole body rotation was applied either in the pitch or yaw plane while presenting a target spot that moved orthogonally to the rotation plane with either 90 degrees phase-lead or 90 degrees phase-lag to the chair signal. After one hour of training at 0.5 Hz (+/- 10 degrees), considerable phase-shift was observed in orthogonal eye movement responses consistent with the training paradigms by identical chair rotation in complete darkness, with further lead at lower frequencies and lag at higher frequencies. However, gains (eye/chair) induced by phase- shift pursuit training was different during pitch and yaw rotation. Although frequency tuning was maintained during pitch in the phase-shift paradigms, it was not maintained during yaw, resulting in higher gains at lower stimulus frequencies compared to the gains during yaw. This difference may reflect otolith contribution during pitch rotation. To understand further the nature of signals that induce adaptive cross axis VOR, we examined interaction of pursuit, whole field-visual pattern and vestibular stimuli. Magnitudes of the cross axis VOR with a spot alone on one hand and with a spot and pattern moving together in the same plane on the other during chair rotation were similar, and when one of the two visual stimuli was stationary during chair rotation, our well trained monkeys did not induce the cross axis VOR. These results suggest that the cross axis VOR induced by pursuit training shares common mechanisms with the cross axis VOR induced by whole field-slip stimuli and that if conflicting information is given between the two visual stimuli, adaptive changes are inhibited. Horizontal GVPs were recorded in the cerebellar floccular lobe during pitch rotation coupled with horizontal pursuit stimuli. These GVPs did not respond to pitch in the dark before training, but responded after 60 min of pursuit training with eye velocity sensitivities similar to those before training. Adaptive change in the VOR was specific to smooth eye movements but not to saccades in our paradigms.