Related Experiment Videos
Context dependence of fundamental-frequency discrimination: lateralized temporal fringes
H Gockel1, R P Carlyon, C Micheyl
1MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom. hedwig.gockel@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk
Abstract:
In a two-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice (2I-2AFC) adaptive procedure, listeners discriminated between the fundamental frequencies (F0s) of two 100-ms harmonic target complexes. This ability can be impaired substantially by the presence of another complex (the "fringe") immediately before and after each target complex. It has been shown that for the impairment to occur (i) target and fringes have to be in the same frequency region; (ii) if all harmonics of target and fringes are unresolved then they may differ in F0; otherwise, they have to be similar [C. Micheyl and R. P. Carlyon, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3006-3018 (1998)]. These findings have been discussed in terms of information about the fringe's F0 being included in the estimate of the F0 of the target, and in terms of auditory streaming. The present study investigated the role of perceived location and ipsilateral versus contralateral presentation of the fringes on F0 discrimination of the target. Experiment 1 used interaural level differences (ILDs), and experiment 2 used interaural time differences (ITDs) to create a range of lateralized perceptions of the 200-ms harmonic fringes. Difference limens for the F0 of the monaural target complex were measured in the presence and absence of the fringes. The nominal F0 was 88 or 250 Hz and could be the same or different for target and fringes. Stimuli were bandpass filtered between 125-625, 1375-1875, or 3900-5400 Hz. In both experiments, the effect of the fringes was reduced when their subjective location differed from that of the target. This reduction depended on the resolvability of both the fringes and the target. The effect of the fringes was reduced most (but still present), when fringes were presented purely contralaterally to the target. The results are consistent with the idea that the fringes produce interference when the listeners have difficulty segregating the target from the fringes, and that a difference in perceived location enhances segregation of the sequentially presented stimuli.