Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On two methods of statistical image analysis.

J Missimer1, U Knorr, R P Maguire

  • 1PET Program, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland. missimer@psi.ch

Human Brain Mapping
|January 5, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

De novo expression of neuropeptide Y in sensory neurons does not contribute to peripheral neuropathic pain.

The journal of pain·2025
Same author

<i>De novo</i> expression of neuropeptide Y in sensory neurons does not contribute to peripheral neuropathic pain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Osteoglycin, a novel coordinator of bone and glucose homeostasis.

Molecular metabolism·2018
Same author

Central RANK signalling in NPY neurons alters bone mass in male mice.

Neuropeptides·2018
Same author

Multimodal Fingerprints of Resting State Networks as assessed by Simultaneous Trimodal MR-PET-EEG Imaging.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

Y5 receptor signalling counteracts the anorectic effects of PYY3-36 in diet-induced obese mice.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2017

This study compares computerized brain atlas (CBA) and statistical parametric mapping (SPM) for PET activation analysis. While methods show robustness in identifying functional regions, quantitative significance evaluation presents challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Image Analysis

Background:

  • Voxel-based statistical evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) activation studies is crucial for understanding brain function.
  • Computerized Brain Atlas (CBA) and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) are prominent procedures for this analysis, involving spatial standardization, statistic computation, and significance evaluation.
  • Common preprocessing steps include image smoothing and global mean correction, particularly in SPM.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of CBA and SPM methods in analyzing regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) using both human volunteer data and simulated activations.
  • To assess the robustness of these methods in identifying functional regions (FRs) and evaluating their statistical significance.
  • To investigate potential obstacles in the quantitative evaluation of functional region significance at various analysis stages.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in 10 human volunteers and 10 simulated activation datasets.
  • Application of CBA and linear SPM standardization methods, followed by smoothing and statistical computation using paired t-test (CBA) or general linear model (SPM).
  • Evaluation of statistical significance using the cluster-size method, with SPM utilizing Gaussian random fields and simulations providing empirical distributions.

Main Results:

  • Analysis of human studies and simulations using similar methods yielded comparable results, supporting the robustness of FR selection.
  • Simulated activations allowed for the evaluation of signal detection efficiency and false positive rates.
  • Quantitative significance evaluation of functional regions was found to encounter significant obstacles throughout the analysis pipeline.

Conclusions:

  • The methods employed for selecting functional regions in PET activation studies demonstrate robustness across both human and simulated data.
  • Despite robust region selection, the quantitative assessment of statistical significance for identified functional regions remains a complex challenge.
  • Further refinement of statistical methodologies is necessary to overcome obstacles in accurately quantifying the significance of functional regions in neuroimaging analyses.