Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testimony based on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory: review, commentary, and guidelines.

R J Craig1

  • 1Illinois School of Professional Psychology, USA.

Journal of Personality Assessment
|January 7, 2000
PubMed
Summary

MCMI test results are admissible in forensic evaluations. This article details test administration, scoring, and interpretation for legal settings, addressing malingering and diagnostic accuracy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measures for mental health outcomes.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2005
Same author

Adjectival descriptions of personality disorders: a convergent validity study of the MCMI-III.

Journal of personality assessment·2001
Same author

Psychological needs associated with MMPI-2 scales in a nonclinical sample.

Journal of personality assessment·2000
Same author

Methadone maintenance. Does dose determine differences in outcome?

Journal of substance abuse treatment·1999
Same author

Stability of the MCMI-III in a substance-abusing inpatient sample.

Psychological reports·1999
Same author

Mibefradil (Posicor) induced sinus arrest.

Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine·1999

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Psychological Assessment

Background:

  • The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) has a history of admissibility in legal proceedings.
  • Forensic evaluations require rigorous assessment of psychological constructs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of MCMI test usage in forensic evaluations.
  • To address key issues concerning the admissibility and application of MCMI results in legal contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Review of MCMI applicability and admissibility in forensic evaluations.
  • Discussion of test administration, scoring, and interpretation for forensic presentation.
  • Analysis of malingering, deception, and behavioral prediction using MCMI data.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • MCMI test results are admissible for various clinical and forensic issues.
  • Key considerations include reliability, validity, and diagnostic efficiency statistics.
  • Computer-assisted interpretation aids forensic presentation of MCMI findings.

Conclusions:

  • Recommendations are provided for effectively utilizing MCMI in forensic evaluations.
  • Proper administration, scoring, and interpretation are crucial for legal admissibility.
  • Addressing potential malingering enhances the utility of MCMI in forensic contexts.