[Mental health among elderly relocated to a rural resort area]

This study examined mental health and its related factors comparing elderly relocated to a rural resort area to elderly living in a rural old area.

Each sample of 400 aged 65 and over were randomly obtained. Valid responses obtained from the resort area and the old area were 193 and 242 respectively. Mental health was measured from two aspects: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and Life Satisfaction Index A (LSIA). We used self-evaluated living environment, social support, social activities, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), economic status, decision to move, and reason for move (push- and pull-factor), as factors which seem to be related to mental health.

The findings were as follows: 1) Respondents in the resort area showed lower GDS and higher LSIA than respondents in the old area. 2) Although for the respondents in the resort area assessment that their community was safe, participation in community groups, or involvement in recreational activities occupied a significant higher level in their mental health, these factors had no significant impact on the mental health among the respondents in the old area. 3) A difference in self-evaluated housing condition, ADL, and economic status between both groups had a cause for the area differences in mental health among the elderly. 4) Push-factor had both a direct effect and an indirect effect mediated by decision to move on GDS. Pull-factor had both a direct and an indirect effect on LSIA.

Elderly relocated to a rural resort area had better mental health than elderly living in an old area, partly because they had better physical health, better economic status, and better housing condition. Self evaluated living environment and social activities were related to the mental health of the elderly in the resort area stronger than that of the elderly in the old area. Reason for move was related to the mental health of the elderly both directly and indirectly mediated by decision to move.