Comparative micromotion of fully and proximally cemented femoral stems

This investigation studied the differences of in vitro micromotion between two stem designs. The two stem types investigated were a proximally cemented stem with distal press fit and a fully cemented stem. After initial micromotion testing to 2250 N in simulated single leg stance and stair climb, six of each stem type were loaded dynamically for 1 million cycles at 950 N at 1 Hz. Micromotion studies were repeated. The two stem types had similar micromotion. For the single leg stance, fully cemented implant motion averaged (+/- 95% confidence) 18 +/- 8 microns toggle, 41 +/- 5 microns axial, and 59 +/- 22 microns rotation. Proximally cemented implant motion averaged 20 +/- 6 microns toggle, 42 +/- 6 microns axial, and 31 +/- 15 microns rotation. For the simulated stair climb, fully cemented implant motion averaged 24 +/- 10 microns toggle, 45 +/- 8 microns axial, and 92 +/- 32 microns rotation. Proximally cemented implant motion averaged 19 +/- 10 microns toggle, 42 +/- 9 microns axial, and 87 +/- 53 microns rotation. For both loading conditions, there were no significant differences measurable between the two systems. After dynamic testing of the fully cemented implants, there were no significant changes in the micromotion of either the toggle or the rotation, but an average of 18 microns increase of axial motion was measured in the fully cemented stem. For the proximally cemented implants, there were no significant changes after dynamic testing. This differences was not considered clinically significant because roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis studies have shown that more than 4 mm of migration is required before clinical symptoms manifest. The protocol developed in this study may help provide a screening process to determine the stability of femoral stem designs before these devices are used clinically.