Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using consensus OPCRIT diagnoses. An efficient procedure for best-estimate lifetime diagnoses.

M H Azevedo1, M J Soares, I Coelho

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Coimbra University, Portugal. helenamh@ci.uc.pt

The British Journal of Psychiatry : the Journal of Mental Science
|January 11, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High vs low protein intake in chronic critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical nutrition ESPEN·2024
Same author

Exploring the potential of Eu<sup>3+</sup> and Mn<sup>4+</sup> activated LaAlO<sub>3</sub> phosphors as red and far-red emitters for horticulture lighting.

RSC advances·2023
Same author

Challenges in measuring energy balance and body composition.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2023
Same author

Re: Percutaneous fetoscopic spina bifida repair: effect on ambulation and need for postnatal cerebrospinal fluid diversion and bladder catheterization.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2021
Same author

Corrigendum to 'Role of up-front autologous stem-cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma for patients in response after induction: an analysis of patients from LYSA centers': [Annals of Oncology Volume 29, Issue 3, March 2018, Pages 715-723].

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2021
Same author

Neurocognitive evaluation using the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA) in an HIV-2 population.

HIV medicine·2020

This study examined whether the OPCRIT checklist could reliably generate psychiatric diagnoses compared to a best-estimate consensus procedure. Researchers compared diagnoses from OPCRIT with those from a consensus-based method using DSM-III-R and ICD-10 criteria. They found strong agreement (kappa = 0.83 and 0.81) between the two diagnostic methods. The results suggest that OPCRIT can be an efficient alternative to traditional procedures. The study included subjects from bipolar and schizophrenia pedigrees and unrelated schizophrenia cases. The findings support the use of automated tools like OPCRIT in large-scale diagnostic assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatric diagnostics
  • Clinical assessment methods
  • Operational diagnostic systems

Background:

Established diagnostic systems like DSM-III and ICD-10 require consistent application for accurate psychiatric diagnoses. Prior research has shown that diagnostic consistency can vary based on the method used. No prior work had resolved whether automated diagnostic tools like OPCRIT could match the accuracy of consensus-based diagnosis methods. This gap motivated researchers to compare automated and consensus-based approaches. Existing studies often rely on subjective diagnostic interviews, which can introduce variability. The need for efficient diagnostic procedures is clear in large-scale psychiatric research. Standardized diagnostic systems are essential for multi-center studies. However, the efficiency of automated tools like OPCRIT remains uncertain.

Purpose Of The Study:

The goal was to assess the diagnostic agreement between OPCRIT-generated diagnoses and best-estimate lifetime diagnoses. Researchers focused on comparing interviewer-based OPCRIT diagnoses with consensus-based diagnoses. The study aimed to determine if OPCRIT could serve as an efficient alternative to traditional methods. Subjects were selected from bipolar and schizophrenia pedigrees and unrelated schizophrenia cases. The study tested agreement under DSM-III-R and ICD-10 criteria. The researchers wanted to evaluate the reliability of OPCRIT in a clinical context. They also aimed to measure inter-rater reliability using Cohen's kappa. The motivation stemmed from the need for streamlined diagnostic procedures.

Keywords:
OPCRIT checklistdiagnostic reliabilitybest-estimate diagnosisDSM-III-RICD-10

Frequently Asked Questions

The study found excellent agreement (kappa = 0.83 for DSM-III-R and 0.81 for ICD-10) between OPCRIT and best-estimate diagnoses.

The OPCRIT checklist was used to generate standardized diagnoses based on 12 operational systems like DSM-III and ICD-10.

The best-estimate procedure involves consensus-based diagnosis, whereas traditional methods rely on individual clinician assessments.

Cohen's kappa measured agreement between OPCRIT and best-estimate diagnoses, showing strong reliability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used the OPCRIT checklist to generate diagnoses based on 12 operational systems. Researchers compared diagnoses from interviewers with those from a best-estimate consensus procedure. They analyzed data from 100 individuals in bipolar or schizophrenia pedigrees and 40 unrelated schizophrenia subjects. Diagnoses were generated under DSM-III-R and ICD-10 guidelines. Cohen's kappa was used to measure agreement between diagnostic methods. The procedure involved multi-generational family assessments. Researchers focused on lifetime diagnostic accuracy. The study design included both automated and consensus-based approaches.

Main Results:

The study found excellent agreement between OPCRIT and best-estimate diagnoses for DSM-III-R (kappa = 0.83). Similar high agreement was observed for ICD-10 (kappa = 0.81). These results suggest strong reliability of the OPCRIT system. The kappa values indicate substantial diagnostic consistency. The findings support the use of OPCRIT in place of traditional procedures. No significant discrepancies were found between methods. The results were consistent across both diagnostic systems. The study demonstrated the efficiency of the OPCRIT procedure.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that OPCRIT can serve as an efficient diagnostic alternative to best-estimate procedures. The high kappa values indicate strong agreement with consensus diagnoses. The study supports the use of OPCRIT in large-scale psychiatric assessments. The findings apply to both DSM-III-R and ICD-10 systems. The authors propose that automated tools like OPCRIT may reduce diagnostic variability. No essential limitations were identified in the OPCRIT method. The results imply that OPCRIT can streamline diagnostic workflows. The authors emphasize the importance of validating automated diagnostic systems.

The study included 100 individuals from bipolar or schizophrenia pedigrees and 40 unrelated schizophrenia subjects.

The authors suggest that OPCRIT may serve as an efficient alternative to traditional best-estimate diagnosis procedures.