Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Should patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer be treated differently?
S M Smorenburg1, B A Hutten, M H Prins
1Department of Vascular Medicine and Cell Biology and Histology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Patients with malignant disease constitute a significant subgroup among patients with venous thromboembolism. Current results suggest that cancer patients are not only at an increased risk for thromboembolic events, particularly during chemotherapy treatment or after surgery, they also have an increased risk for bleeding complications while receiving oral anticoagulant treatment. The exact incidences of venous thromboembolic complications for the various types of cancer, however, are not well determined. Recent studies have indicated that subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is as safe and effective as intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. Moreover, a meta-analysis has provided preliminary evidence that, compared with UFH, LMWH treatment may prolong survival in cancer patients. Initiation of LMWH treatment in these patients is, therefore, recommended. Prospective randomized clinical trials to assess the optimum dose and duration of therapy are called for.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management

