Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hardware considerations for MR imaging physics.

F Schmitt1, A Dewdney, W Renz

  • 1MR Engineering Group, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|January 13, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolomics of stallion seminal plasma: Identification of potential fertility biomarkers based on differences between high and low pregnancy stallions.

Journal of equine veterinary science·2026
Same author

[Assessment tool's validation study for a simulation-based skin suturing skill].

Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2024
Same author

Retrospective study to estimate the prevalence and describe the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes of HER2-low breast cancer.

ESMO open·2023
Same author

The German Network for Personalized Medicine to enhance patient care and translational research.

Nature medicine·2023
Same author

A preliminary study of cerebral blood flow, aging and dementia in people with Down syndrome.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2020
Same author

ACCIDENTAL FINDING OF SYNCHRONOUS BILATERAL DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU IN A YOUNG MAN REFERRED TO MASTECTOMY DUE TO GYNECOMASTIA - AND WHAT IF LIPOSUCTION HAVE BEEN USED? CASE REPORT.

Acta chirurgiae plasticae·2020
Same journal

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Innovation, Integration, and Clinical Impact.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances and Innovations in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Climate Change and Globally Sustainable Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Strain Imaging in Heart Failure.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Modern magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scanners have significantly improved diagnostic image quality since 1984. Optimal performance relies on precisely matching key components like the magnet, gradient, and radiofrequency (RF) systems.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Physics

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging, introduced commercially in 1984, has revolutionized medical diagnostics.
  • Continuous advancements have led to substantial improvements in MR image quality.
  • Understanding the interplay of system components is crucial for maximizing diagnostic utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the characteristics of a modern MR imaging scanner.
  • To elucidate the critical importance of component matching in MR systems.
  • To ensure optimal performance of MR imaging technology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of MR imaging system components, focusing on magnet, gradient, and RF subsystems.
  • Analysis of the design principles for modern MR imaging hardware.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the integration and synergistic operation of these components.

    • Main Results:

    • A modern MR imaging scanner integrates advanced magnet, gradient, and RF technologies.
    • Precise matching of these components is essential for achieving high-fidelity MR images.
    • Suboptimal component integration can lead to image artifacts and reduced diagnostic accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • The performance of an MR imaging system is critically dependent on the harmonious integration of its core components.
    • Future advancements in MR imaging quality will rely on continued innovation and precise engineering of these subsystems.
    • This integrated approach ensures the continued evolution of MR imaging as a premier diagnostic tool.