Comparison between computer-aided diagnosis and radiologists: assessment of pulmonary blood flow on chest radiographs

To evaluate the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for estimating increased pulmonary blood flow on chest radiographs, we compared computerized assessment with findings by radiologists. Our CAD scheme extracts selectively linear opacities corresponding to vessels in regions of interest (ROIs) in the right upper and lower lung zones on digitized chest radiographs, and then calculates a radiographic index as a physical measure that reflects the area of the extracted opacities in selected ROIs. As a measure of increased pulmonary blood flow, the upper/lower radiographic index ratio was calculated for each patient. Seven radiologists estimated the degree of increased pulmonary blood flow for the same images of ROI sets presented on a cathode-ray tube monitor in a randomized order. Between the normal-pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) group and increased-PCWP groups, there was no significant difference in performance between CAD and radiologists (p = 0.105). However, when the normal and mild PCWP groups were compared, the performance of CAD was superior to that of radiologists (p = 0.001). This study indicates that our CAD scheme is promising for quantitative estimation of increased pulmonary blood flow, especially in mild cases.