Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processing of syntactic information monitored by brain surface current density mapping based on MEG.

T R Knösche1, B Maess, A D Friederici

  • 1Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany.

Brain Topography
|January 21, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microscopic electric fields form mesoscale electric fields and influence TMS activation thresholds.

Brain stimulation·2025
Same author

Alpha power during task performance predicts individual language comprehension.

NeuroImage·2022
Same author

Infant cognition includes the potentially human-unique ability to encode embedding.

Science advances·2018
Same author

Zoomed MRI Guided by Combined EEG/MEG Source Analysis: A Multimodal Approach for Optimizing Presurgical Epilepsy Work-up and its Application in a Multi-focal Epilepsy Patient Case Study.

Brain topography·2017
Same author

A revival of Homo loquens as a builder of labeled structures: Neurocognitive considerations.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2017
Same author

Neural networks for harmonic structure in music perception and action.

NeuroImage·2016

This study used Brain Surface Current Density (BSCD) mapping to analyze brain activity during auditory language processing. Results show distinct temporal cortex and frontal/parietal area activation differences between correct and incorrect syntax, with right hemisphere involvement noted.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cortical language networks are complex spatially and temporally.
  • fMRI/PET offer limited temporal resolution; ERPs lack spatial precision.
  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) offers high temporal and better spatial resolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate brain activity differences in response to syntactically correct versus incorrect auditory language input.
  • To identify the spatial and temporal dynamics of language processing using BSCD mapping.
  • To explore the role of different brain regions, including the right hemisphere, in auditory language comprehension.

Main Methods:

  • Brain Surface Current Density (BSCD) mapping applied to a standard brain model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of statistically significant differences in brain region activity.
  • Comparison of brain responses to syntactically correct and incorrect auditory stimuli within the first 600 ms post-violation onset.

    • Main Results:

    • Activity is concentrated in temporal, frontal, and parietal areas within 600 ms of a syntax violation.
    • Statistically significant differential activity is primarily observed in frontal and temporal cortices.
    • For latencies exceeding 250 ms, differential activity is more pronounced in the right hemisphere.

    Conclusions:

    • BSCD mapping effectively differentiates brain activity related to syntactic correctness in auditory language.
    • Findings support the involvement of both hemispheres in auditory language processing.
    • The right hemisphere may play a role in error detection and re-analysis, supporting left-hemisphere specialization.