Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Induced motion at texture-defined motion boundaries.

A Johnston1, C P Benton, P W McOwan

  • 1Department of Psychology, University College London, UK. a.johnston@ucl.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|January 22, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Embedded unexploded ordnance encountered during combat casualty care: a review of clinical management for UK deployed service personnel.

BMJ military health·2025
Same author

Modelling long-term outcomes for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2024
Same author

A review of analytical parameters in 'rapid' liquid chromatographic methods for bioanalysis: Can we do better?

Journal of chromatography. A·2024
Same author

Multi-perspective region-based CNNs for vertebrae labeling in intraoperative long-length images.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2022
Same author

Experimental Search for Neutron to Mirror Neutron Oscillations as an Explanation of the Neutron Lifetime Anomaly.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Current management of adults receiving oral anti-cancer medications: A scoping review.

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society·2021
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a model for visual perception that explains how the brain processes texture-defined motion, a complex type of visual motion. The model successfully predicts perceived motion speed, offering insights into visual processing systems.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Perception Psychology

Background:

  • Second-order motion, such as texture-defined motion, poses challenges for standard spatio-temporal energy models of motion perception.
  • Existing theories propose parallel processing pathways for luminance-defined and second-order motion, but this remains debated.
  • Understanding how the visual system processes texture-defined motion is crucial for a comprehensive theory of motion perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and evaluate a computational model capable of processing both luminance-defined and texture-defined motion.
  • To investigate the model's ability to account for induced motion phenomena observed in texture-defined motion sequences.
  • To compare the model's predictions with empirical measurements of perceived motion direction and speed.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computational model simulating visual motion processing.
  • Utilized contrast-modulated static noise textures as stimuli.
  • Measured perceived direction and speed of contrast envelope and induced motion.
  • Compared model predictions with experimental data.

Main Results:

  • The model successfully processed both luminance-defined and texture-defined motion.
  • The model accounted for induced motion in specific texture-defined motion sequences.
  • Model predictions for the perceived speed of induced motion at texture boundaries showed significant agreement with measurements.
  • The investigated induced motion was differentiated from classical induced effects.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed model offers a viable framework for understanding the processing of second-order motion, including complex induced motion effects.
  • The findings support the idea that distinct mechanisms may underlie different types of motion perception.
  • This research advances our understanding of visual motion perception beyond simple luminance-based cues.